Abstract By contrasting the different explanations offered by two approaches - Generative Grammar and Form-Content analysis - for the same linguistic data (the non-occurrence of ∗ se se sequences in Spanish) it is demonstrated that analytical practice is indeed dependent on theoretical principles. Generative Grammar's view of language as a unique, species-specific phenomenon, is shown to be coherent both with an acceptance of traditional categories and with a purely model-like, ‘internal’ explanation. Form-Content's view of language as a tool for communication manipulated by human beings results in an ‘external’ type explanation: the non-occurrence of se se is only to be expected, given the Form-Content (non-traditional) account of the observed uses of se in Spanish.
[1]
John Robert Ross,et al.
Constraints on variables in syntax
,
1967
.
[2]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
Language and Mind
,
1973
.
[3]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
Problems of Knowledge and Freedom
,
1971
.
[4]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
Logical structures in language
,
1957
.
[5]
David M. Perlmutter.
Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax
,
1973
.
[6]
Noam Chomsky.
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
,
1964
.
[7]
Heles Contreras,et al.
The role of theory in linguistic analysis : the Spanish pronoun system
,
1976
.
[8]
Noam Chomsky,et al.
वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax
,
1965
.