A participatory action research training initiative to improve police effectiveness

Police work is becoming extremely complex, challenging, demanding, and ill-structured, which calls for better problem-solving and decision-making skills from police workers. Participatory action research approach is applied to understand how training methodologies can contribute to creative thinking, exploration of alternatives and democratization, consequently enhancing the problem-solving and decision-making skills of field-level police workers. A series of five sessions with two groups of police workers provided substantial insights that informed the research methodology, the learning experience of participants and the relative value of various training delivery modes for improving problem-solving and decision-making skills. The methodology gave opportunities to the researcher and the participants to reflect on processes and learn from the feedback. The study reveals that the training must seek to give voice to the learners and help them to discover an agency through which they can critically reflect on the needs of their job and fulfil them. This study reflects on the question of rigour and relevance in PAR and provides directions for future research.

[1]  R. Glaser,et al.  Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction , 1989 .

[2]  Robert Davison,et al.  GSS and action research in the Hong Kong police , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  P. Marcuse From critical urban theory to the right to the city , 2009 .

[4]  P. Roberts Freire and Dostoevsky , 2005 .

[5]  Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt,et al.  Action Research for Change and Development , 2021 .

[6]  A. Cattell The Adult Learner – The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development , 2005 .

[7]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[8]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Issues and Concerns About Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator's Perspective , 1996, MIS Q..

[9]  M. El-den,et al.  Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .

[10]  Peter McLaren Research news and Comment: A Pedagogy of Possibility: Reflecting Upon Paulo Freire’s Politics of Education , 1999 .

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Urban renaissance? : New Labour, community and urban policy , 2003 .

[13]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[14]  J. Senn,et al.  The challenge of relating IS research to practice , 1998 .

[15]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Tools for Complex Projects , 2008 .

[16]  Municipal Policing Meets the New Deal , 2007 .

[17]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[18]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[19]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[20]  Tony Monchinski,et al.  Critical Pedagogy and the Everyday Classroom , 2008 .

[21]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Greenway Medical Technologies: Challenging the Goliaths in Electronic Medical Records , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  M. Raco,et al.  Community and the changing nature of urban policy , 2003 .

[23]  Elwood F. Holton,et al.  The Adult Learner : The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development , 1998 .

[24]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[25]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[26]  R. McTaggart Principles for Participatory Action Research , 1991 .

[27]  Robert Davison,et al.  An instrument for measuring meeting success , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Group Support Systems: Barriers to Adoption in a Cross-Cultural Setting , 1998 .

[29]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Robert Davison,et al.  An instrument for measuring meeting success: revalidation and modification , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Henry A. Giroux,et al.  Radical Pedagogy as Cultural Politics: Beyond the Discourse of Critique and Anti-Utopianism , 1991 .

[32]  J. McNiff Action Research Principles and Practice , 1988 .

[33]  Michel Foucoult Discipline and Punish , 2012 .

[34]  F. Baum,et al.  Participatory action research , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[35]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  Exploring Modes of Facilitative Support for GDSS Technology , 1993, MIS Q..

[36]  Barry Kanpol Critical Pedagogy: An Introduction , 1994 .

[37]  R. Arnett Paulo Freire’s Revolutionary Pedagogy: From a Story-Centered to a Narrative-Centered Communication Ethic , 2002 .

[38]  Davydd J. Greenwood Action research : from practice to writing in an international action research development program , 1999 .

[39]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Trying to improve communication and collaboration with information technology: An action research project which failed , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.

[40]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[41]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..