Aalborg Universitet Coverage comparison of GPRS , NB-IoT , LoRa , and SigFox in a 7800 km 2 area

In this simulation work the coverage of GPRS, Narrowband-IoT, LoRa, and SigFox is compared in a realistic scenario, covering 7800 km and using Telenor’s commercial 2G, 3G, and 4G deployment. The target is to evaluate which of the four technologies provides the best coverage for Internet of Things devices, which may be located deep indoor. The results show that Narrowband-IoT, having the best Maximum Coupling Loss performance of 164 dB, also provides the best coverage. This is despite the fact that LoRa and SigFox deployments with omnidirectional antennas are found to provide 3 dB lower link loss on average. In the deployment 11 % of the geographical area contains devices, located both in rural and urban areas. The NB-IoT has an outage below 1 % for locations experiencing 20 dB indoor penetration loss in addition to the outdoor path loss. SigFox performs similarly, while LoRa cannot provide coverage for 2 % of those locations. For the challenging deep indoor case, where 30 dB additional penetration loss is expected, NB-IoT has 8 % outage while SigFox and LoRa is unable to cover 13 % and 20 % of the locations. The four technologies may not be deployed at all existing site locations and therefore the work also includes a study of the coverage as a function of the minimum Inter-Site Distance, where sites closer than 2, 4, and 6 km are filtered out. The results show that SigFox and NB-IoT have outage probabilities below 5 % even though sites closer than 4 km are removed from the simulations.