Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions.

Racial bias appears to lead jurors in trials of stranger rape to convict Black defendants more readily and to sentence them more harshly than White defendants. It was hypothesized that jurors in an acquaintance rape case would demonstrate a different pattern of bias, based not only on the race of the defendant but also on the racial nature of the defendant-victim relationship. White American undergraduates read a trial transcript that established defendant-victim familiarity and sexual contact but was ambiguous about the victim's consent. Race of defendant and of victim (Black or White) were varied on a 2 x 2 design. The participants were asked to rate the guilt of the defendant and to recommend a sentence. Both Black and White defendants were rated as more guilty when the victim's race differed from their own.

[1]  J. Pfeifer,et al.  Ambiguity and Guilt Determinations: A Modern Racism Perspective' , 1991 .

[2]  S. Klein,et al.  Race and imprisonment decisions in California. , 1990, Science.

[3]  James D. Johnson,et al.  Assessing the effects of factors that might underlie the differential perception of acquaintance and stranger rape , 1988 .

[4]  Mary Ann Holston,et al.  Tolerance, Sociability, Sex, and Race: Correlates of Attitudes toward Interracial Marriage , 1988 .

[5]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Judging the Jury. , 1987 .

[6]  S. Ng.  Equity and social categorization effects on intergroup allocation of rewards , 1984 .

[7]  Sheila R. Deitz,et al.  Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness , 1984 .

[8]  M. Zanna,et al.  Retaliation Against Sexual Assault: Self-Defense or Public Duty? , 1983 .

[9]  L. Foley,et al.  The Effect of Race and Personality on Mock Jurors' Decisions , 1982 .

[10]  K. Klein,et al.  Race, Rape, and Bias: Distortion of Prior Odds and Meaning Changes , 1982 .

[11]  G. LaFree.  The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. , 1980, American sociological review.

[12]  H. S. Feild.  Rape trials and jurors' decisions , 1979 .

[13]  D. C. Ugwuegbu.  Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility , 1979 .

[14]  L. Calhoun,et al.  Sex Differences in the Social Perception of Rape Victims , 1977 .

[15]  David B. Gray,et al.  Biasing Influence of Defendants' Characteristics on Simulated Sentencing , 1976 .

[16]  V. A. Harris,et al.  Race, Socio-Economic Status, and Perceived Similarity as Determinants of Judgements by Simulated Jurors. , 1975 .

[17]  Ronald E. Smith,et al.  Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral Dilemma , 1973 .

[18]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[19]  H. Bullock.  Significance of the Racial Factor in the Length of Prison Sentences , 1961 .

[20]  G. B. Johnson.  The Negro and Crime , 1941 .

[21]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  The Impacts of Evidence and Extralegal Factors in Jurors' Decisions , 1986 .

[22]  Michael Sunnafrank,et al.  General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. , 1983 .

[23]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  The Polls: Ethnic Social Distance and Prejudice , 1983 .

[24]  J. Bernard.  Interaction between the race of the defendant and that of jurors in determining verdicts. , 1979 .