Effect of Asymmetric Geometry on the Flexibility of Stent

Mechanical characteristic assessment of the new stent design is important to improve the performance during the stenting process. Stent with good performance in geometric assessment should pass several tests in the unexpanded and expanded condition. The FEM assessment is expected to replace the actual mechanical assessment to save the cost and time of the manufacturing. In this study, the FEM assessment is conducted using the structural nonlinear analyses in ANSYS R15.0. The stent type used in the simulation is the Asymmetric stent and the Sinusoidal stent. The assessments included in this study are the flexibility test on the unexpanded condition (single-load and multi-load) and that on the expanded condition under single point loading. The three-point bending test is chosen as the flexibility test, either for the unexpanded or expanded condition, due to its simplicity. To restrain angular deformation and more save the computation process, a symmetry model (due to longitudinal and angular plane) of each stent type is constructed. By utilizing Multi Point Constraint (MPC) element, the loading is subjected over a pilot node at the center line of the stent. The analysis results showed that Asymmetric stent has lower flexibility comparing with a Sinusoidal stent in the unexpanded configurations. In the case of an Asymmetric stent, its inflated-side is more flexible than the fixed-side.

[1]  S. Chua,et al.  Finite element simulation of slotted tube (stent) with the presence of plaque and artery by balloon expansion , 2004 .

[2]  Lorenza Petrini,et al.  Numerical investigation of the intravascular coronary stent flexibility. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Sun Kook Yoo,et al.  A comparative reliability and performance study of different stent designs in terms of mechanical properties: foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and flexibility. , 2013, Artificial organs.

[4]  Min Qi,et al.  An FEA method to study flexibility of expanded coronary stents , 2007 .

[5]  Régis Rieu,et al.  Assessment of the trackability, flexibility, and conformability of coronary stents: A comparative analysis , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  D Glogar,et al.  Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Austrian Wiktor Stent Study Group and European Paragon Stent Investigators. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Zihui Xia,et al.  On the finite element modelling of balloon-expandable stents. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Stent flexibility versus concertina effect: mechanism of an unpleasant trade-off in stent design and its implications for stent selection in the cath-lab. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Selection of coronary stents. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Achmad Syaifudin,et al.  Development of balloon-expandable stents for treatment of eccentric plaque considering surface roughening , 2016 .

[11]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Effects of Stent Structure on Stent Flexibility Measurements , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.