Introduction Low-back pain with accompanying neurogenic claudication is a common diagnosis in pain and spine centers around the world, with an evolving algorithm of treatment. One option for the treatment of neurogenic claudication by decompressive strategies centers on percutaneous direct decompressive techniques. Although commonly employed in clinical practice, there have been no formal investigations looking at safety of percutaneous direct decompression without the use of an epidurogram and relying on osteal landmarks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of percutaneous direct decompression performed without the use of the epidurogram. Methods After an IRB exemption had been obtained from the Western Investigational Review Board, data were retrospectively analyzed from July 2018 to August 2020 on patients that had undergone percutaneous direct decompression using the Mild procedure in a single center by a single physician. Data were analyzed quantitatively for reported complications within 3 months of the procedure, including nerve injury, hematoma, infection, death, or allergic reaction to contrast use.– Results Chart review yielded 147 individual patients who had undergone percutaneous direct decompression from July 2018 to August 2020. In this data set, women outnumbered men, with an average age of 76 years, with L4–L5 followed by L3–L4 being the most common levels decompressed. Of the 147 patients was performed, utilizing an epidurogram versus no epidurogram for decompression, with no complications. These data are the first to describe the safety of percutaneous direct lumbar decompression without the use of contrast. Conclusion This study strongly suggests the use of an epidurogram is not necessary for the safe decompression of a patient with symptomatic spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication utilizing percutaneous direct decompression.
[1]
T. Deer,et al.
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety.
,
2020,
Pain management.
[2]
T. Lamer,et al.
The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment
,
2018,
Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.
[3]
P. Staats,et al.
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication
,
2018,
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.
[4]
P. Staats,et al.
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE
,
2018
.
[5]
P. Staats,et al.
MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
,
2016,
Pain physician.
[6]
P. Staats,et al.
MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
,
2016,
Pain physician.
[7]
T. Hansson,et al.
The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum
,
2009,
European Spine Journal.