Domain Transfer Multiple Kernel Boosting for Classification of EEG Motor Imagery Signals

The application of wireless sensors in the brain–computer interface (BCI) system provides great convenience for the acquisition of electroencephalography (EEG) signals. However, a large amount of training data is needed to build the classification architectures used in motor imagery (MI) brain–computer interface (BCI), which is time-consuming to generate. To address this issue, transfer learning has gained significant attention in a small sample setting BCI system. The transfer learning methods have shown promising results by leveraging labeled patterns from the source domain to learn robust classifiers for the target domain, which has only a limited number of labeled samples. However, the successful application of such approaches in a motor imagery BCI remains limited. In this paper, we present a novel framework called domain transfer multiple kernel boosting (DTMKB), which extends the DTMKL algorithms by applying boosting techniques for learning kernel-based classifiers with the transfer of multiple kernels. Based on the proposed framework, we examined their empirical performance in comparison to several state-of-the-art algorithms on two MI task datasets. DTMKB yields the best performance for all datasets and achieves the best average classification accuracy 87.60%, 76.00%, 74.66%, and 74.13%, respectively. In particular, the proposed framework can be applied successfully in a small sample of EEG motor imagery signals.

[1]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  David Lee,et al.  Filter Bank Regularized Common Spatial Pattern Ensemble for Small Sample Motor Imagery Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Steven Lemm,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set III: probabilistic modeling of sensorimotor /spl mu/ rhythms for classification of imaginary hand movements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  Increasing session-to-session transfer in a brain–computer interface with on-site background noise acquisition , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Regularizing Common Spatial Patterns to Improve BCI Designs: Unified Theory and New Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[9]  Dezhi Zheng,et al.  Transfer Kernel Common Spatial Patterns for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Classification , 2018, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[10]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  Integrating structured biological data by Kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy , 2006, ISMB.

[11]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multitask Learning for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2010, AISTATS.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Transfer Learning in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2015, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[14]  Shiliang Sun,et al.  A subject transfer framework for EEG classification , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[15]  Chun-Hsiang Chuang,et al.  An Inflatable and Wearable Wireless System for Making 32-Channel Electroencephalogram Measurements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Transferring Subspaces Between Subjects in Brain--Computer Interfacing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  S. Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: a review , 2003 .

[18]  Xiuzhen Cheng,et al.  Opportunistic Sensing in Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Application , 2014, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[19]  Wei Jiang,et al.  A New Motor Imagery EEG Classification Method FB-TRCSP+RF Based on CSP and Random Forest , 2018, IEEE Access.

[20]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  Domain Transfer Multiple Kernel Learning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[21]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Correcting Sample Selection Bias by Unlabeled Data , 2006, NIPS.

[22]  Zhenyu Na,et al.  Multi-Modal Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Based on Dempster-Shafer Fusion in 5G-Based Cognitive Radio , 2018, IEEE Access.

[23]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  EEG Data Space Adaptation to Reduce Intersession Nonstationarity in Brain-Computer Interface , 2013, Neural Computation.

[24]  Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[25]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  Domain Transfer SVM for video concept detection , 2009, CVPR 2009.

[26]  Yves Grandvalet,et al.  Y.: SimpleMKL , 2008 .

[27]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Deep transfer learning for error decoding from non-invasive EEG , 2017, 2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[28]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Subject-independent mental state classification in single trials , 2009, Neural Networks.

[29]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Transfer Learning via Dimensionality Reduction , 2008, AAAI.

[30]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Yiming Jin,et al.  Adaptive CSP with subspace alignment for subject-to-subject transfer in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces , 2018, 2018 6th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

[33]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Composite Common Spatial Pattern for Subject-to-Subject Transfer , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.