Co-Benefits of Sustainable Forest Management in Biodiversity Conservation and Carbon Sequestration

Background Sustainable forest management (SFM), which has been recently introduced to tropical natural production forests, is beneficial in maintaining timber resources, but information about the co-benefits for biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration is currently lacking. Methodology/Principal Findings We estimated the diversity of medium to large-bodied forest-dwelling vertebrates using a heat-sensor camera trapping system and the amount of above-ground, fine-roots, and soil organic carbon by a combination of ground surveys and aerial-imagery interpretations. This research was undertaken both in SFM applied as well as conventionally logged production forests in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Our carbon estimation revealed that the application of SFM resulted in a net gain of 54 Mg C ha-1 on a landscape scale. Overall vertebrate diversity was greater in the SFM applied forest than in the conventionally logged forest. Specifically, several vertebrate species (6 out of recorded 36 species) showed higher frequency in the SFM applied forest than in the conventionally logged forest. Conclusions/Significance The application of SFM to degraded natural production forests could result in greater diversity and abundance of vertebrate species as well as increasing carbon storage in the tropical rain forest ecosystems.

[1]  Sam Mannan,et al.  Sustainable use of tropical forests by reduced-impact logging in Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia , 2007, Ecological Research.

[2]  B. Goossens,et al.  Aerial Surveys Give New Estimates for Orangutans in Sabah, Malaysia , 2004, PLoS biology.

[3]  F. Putz,et al.  Retaining Forest Biomass By Reducing Logging Damage , 1996 .

[4]  Naeem,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis , 2005 .

[5]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[6]  P. Sist,et al.  Harvesting intensity versus sustainability in Indonesia , 1998 .

[7]  J. Heuveldop,et al.  A management planning concept for sustained yield of tropical forests in Sabah, Malaysia☆ , 1993 .

[8]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[9]  W. Kollert,et al.  Do Certified Tropical Logs Fetch a Market Premium? A Comparative Price Analysis from Sabah, Malaysia , 2007 .

[10]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[11]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[12]  Plinio Sist,et al.  An experimental comparison of different harvesting intensities with reduced-impact and conventional logging in East Kalimantan, Indonesia , 1997 .

[13]  A. Gitelson Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. , 2004, Journal of plant physiology.

[14]  F. Putz,et al.  Improved Tropical Forest Management for Carbon Retention , 2008, PLoS biology.

[15]  F. Putz,et al.  Reduced-impact logging : Challenges and opportunities , 2008 .

[16]  M. Soulé,et al.  ECOLOGY: Conservation Targets: Do They Help? , 1998, Science.