Hyperactivity and creativity: The tacit dimension

Discriminant analysis was performed on the combined data from two previous studies of high-IQ children with attention disorder and hyperactivity. The variables that best discriminated these from normal children were left-sided laterality, the ability to perceive coherence tacitly, the use of incidentally acquired information, stimulation seeking, and the use of imagery in problem solving and in a creativity task. Regression analysis indicated that figural creativity is best predicted by the ability to perceive relationships tacitly, by good memory for pictured objects, and by verbal creativity. A model was proposed to help explain the functioning of intelligent and creative attention-disordered individuals.

[1]  G. Logan Automaticity and cognitive control. , 1989 .

[2]  The Psychology of Thinking , 1972 .

[3]  E. Merrin Motor and Sighting Dominance in Chronic Schizophrenics , 1984, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  Maureen Dennis,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1988 .

[5]  G. Wallas The art of thought , 1926 .

[6]  G. A. Shaw,et al.  Laterality and creativity concomitants of attention problems , 1990 .

[7]  G. A. Shaw The use of imagery by intelligent and by creative schoolchildren. , 1985, The Journal of general psychology.

[8]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL USE OF INCIDENTAL STIMULI IN PROBLEM SOLVING AS A FUNCTION OF CREATIVITY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  M. Zuckerman Sensation Seeking : Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal , 1979 .

[10]  G. A. Shaw,et al.  Laterality, Implicit Memory and Attention Disorder , 1991 .

[11]  J. Levy Language, cognition, and the right hemisphere. A response to Gazzaniga. , 1983, The American psychologist.

[12]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Automatic and effortful processing in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 1988, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[13]  D E Meyer,et al.  Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  N. Geschwind The biology of cerebral dominance: implications for cognition , 1984, Cognition.

[15]  L. Siegel,et al.  The effects of methylphenidate on levels of processing and laterality in children with attention deficit disorder , 1988, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[16]  Bruno G. Bara,et al.  Logical expertise as a cause of error: A reply to Boolos , 1984, Cognition.

[17]  C. Conners Rating scales for use in drug studies with children , 1973 .

[18]  Daniel G. Youpa,et al.  Activating Tasks for the Study of Visual-Spatial Attention in ADHD Children: A Cognitive Anatomic Approach , 1991, Journal of child neurology.

[19]  Leonard M. Giambra,et al.  Task‐unrelated thoughts of college students diagnosed as hyperactive in childhood , 1993 .

[20]  M. Conway,et al.  Individual differences in nonconscious processing: The role of creativity , 1990 .

[21]  T R Zentall,et al.  Optimal stimulation: a model of disordered activity and performance in normal and deviant children. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  K. Bowers,et al.  The Unconscious Reconsidered , 1982 .

[23]  R. Sternberg Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .