The Ste5 Scaffold Directs Mating Signaling by Catalytically Unlocking the Fus3 MAP Kinase for Activation

The scaffold protein Ste5 is required to properly direct signaling through the yeast mating pathway to the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Fus3. Scaffolds are thought to function by tethering kinase and substrate in proximity. We find, however, that the previously identified Fus3-binding site on Ste5 is not required for signaling, suggesting an alternative mechanism controls Fus3's activation by the MAPKK Ste7. Reconstituting MAPK signaling in vitro, we find that Fus3 is an intrinsically poor substrate for Ste7, although the related filamentation MAPK, Kss1, is an excellent substrate. We identify and structurally characterize a domain in Ste5 that catalytically unlocks Fus3 for phosphorylation by Ste7. This domain selectively increases the k(cat) of Ste7-->Fus3 phosphorylation but has no effect on Ste7-->Kss1 phosphorylation. The dual requirement for both Ste7 and this Ste5 domain in Fus3 activation explains why Fus3 is selectively activated by the mating pathway and not by other pathways that also utilize Ste7.

[1]  Matthias Peter,et al.  MAP kinase dynamics in response to pheromones in budding yeast , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  Thomas C. Terwilliger,et al.  Automated MAD and MIR structure solution , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[4]  Michael J E Sternberg,et al.  Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre , 2008, Proteins.

[5]  W. Lim,et al.  Docking interactions in protein kinase and phosphatase networks. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Hiten D. Madhani,et al.  Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5 , 2006, Current Genetics.

[7]  David O. Morgan,et al.  Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates , 2005, Nature.

[8]  Richard J Morris,et al.  ARP/wARP and automatic interpretation of protein electron density maps. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[10]  Caleb J Bashor,et al.  The Ste5 Scaffold Allosterically Modulates Signaling Output of the Yeast Mating Pathway , 2006, Science.

[11]  E. Elion,et al.  Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae , 1994, Cell.

[12]  Thomas C. Terwilliger,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Automated Main-chain Model Building by Template Matching and Iterative Fragment Extension , 2022 .

[13]  Randy J Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination , 2022 .

[14]  J. Thorner,et al.  Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. , 1997, Science.

[15]  T. Hughes,et al.  Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins , 2001, Current Biology.

[16]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[17]  Michael Knop,et al.  Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  W. Delano.  The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[19]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein-protein interactions. , 1997, Genetics.

[20]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[21]  R. Hynes,et al.  Distribution and evolution of von Willebrand/integrin A domains: widely dispersed domains with roles in cell adhesion and elsewhere. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  Lan Huang,et al.  Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[24]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Persistent Activation by Constitutive Ste7 Promotes Kss1-Mediated Invasive Growth but Fails To Support Fus3-Dependent Mating in Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  N. Pavletich.  Mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation: structures of Cdks, their cyclin activators, and Cip and INK4 inhibitors. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  B. Cairns,et al.  Signaling in the yeast pheromone response pathway: specific and high-affinity interaction of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases Kss1 and Fus3 with the upstream MAP kinase kinase Ste7 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[27]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[28]  H. Daniel,et al.  Re-examining the phylogeny of clinically relevant Candida species and allied genera based on multigene analyses. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[29]  C. Kurtzman,et al.  Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora. , 2003, FEMS yeast research.

[30]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Scaffolds, adaptors and linkers of TCR signaling: theory and practice. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[31]  A. Neiman,et al.  A membrane binding domain in the ste5 scaffold synergizes with gbetagamma binding to control localization and signaling in pheromone response. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[32]  Supplemental Data Regulation of Cell Signaling Dynamics by the Protein Kinase-Scaffold Ste 5 , 2008 .

[33]  Kevin P. Byrne,et al.  Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  G. Fink,et al.  A role for autophosphorylation revealed by activated alleles of FUS3, the yeast MAP kinase homolog. , 1994, Molecular biology of the cell.

[35]  N. Friedman,et al.  Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi , 2007, Nature.

[36]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases with Distinct Requirements for Ste5 Scaffolding Influence Signaling Specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  J. Thorner,et al.  Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[38]  A. Neiman,et al.  A Membrane Binding Domain in the Ste5 Scaffold Synergizes with Gβγ Binding to Control Localization and Signaling in Pheromone Response , 2005 .

[39]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[40]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  The role of docking interactions in mediating signaling input, output, and discrimination in the yeast MAPK network. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[41]  John R. Yates,et al.  Pheromone-Dependent Destruction of the Tec1 Transcription Factor Is Required for MAP Kinase Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[42]  K. Clark,et al.  Association of the yeast pheromone response G protein beta gamma subunits with the MAP kinase scaffold Ste5p. , 1995, Science.