Co-evolution of the strategic reorientation of port actors: insights from the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Barcelona

This paper explores changes in the strategic orientation of port authorities and terminal operators towards the hinterland network in the Ports of Rotterdam and Barcelona. Port authorities and terminal operators are economically, institutionally and geographically related organizations. The argument here is that such organizations experience a mutually influential and interactive effect in their strategy over time. The research explores the evolution of the market, institutional and governance forces behind these organizations’ strategic orientation, while acknowledging their interdependence and interrelationship. To that end, it builds a conceptual framework analysing these organizations’ strategies in different points in time. It draws upon firms and port theories to design a co-evolutionary framework, which is later refined with insights gained from an empirical study of the port context.

[1]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[2]  A. Lewin,et al.  Prolegomena on Coevolution: a Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[3]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines , 2013 .

[4]  Paul DiMaggio.  The New Institutionalisms: Avenues of Collaboration , 1998 .

[5]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: the Brazilian experiences , 2013 .

[6]  Peter Hall,et al.  Shifting Proximities: The Maritime Ports Sector in an Era of Global Supply Chains , 2010 .

[7]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[8]  Roy van den Berg,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the effects of modal split obligations in terminal concession contracts , 2014 .

[9]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Port Economics, Policy and Management: Content Classification and Survey , 2011 .

[11]  R. Langlois,et al.  Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization , 1997 .

[12]  Richard W. Carney,et al.  Changes to the Ownership and Control of East Asian Corporations between 1996 and 2008: The Primacy of Politics , 2012 .

[13]  Simone Strambach,et al.  Path Dependence and Path Plasticity: The Co-evolution of Institutions and Innovation – the German Customized Business Software Industry , 2010 .

[14]  Randy Stoecker,et al.  Evaluating and Rethinking the Case Study , 1991 .

[15]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[16]  Peter Hall,et al.  Regional Institutional Convergence? Reflections from the Baltimore Waterfront , 2003 .

[17]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[18]  Robert A. Burgelman,et al.  Strategy Is Destiny: How Strategy-Making Shapes a Company's Future , 2002 .

[19]  Timothy Irwin,et al.  Some options for improving the governance of state-owned electricity utilities , 2004 .

[20]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION, STRATEGIC CHANGE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A STUDY OF RAILROAD DEREGULATION , 1987 .

[21]  Francis M. Bator,et al.  The Anatomy of Market Failure , 1958 .

[22]  Wladimir M. Sachs,et al.  Coevolution of Institutions and Corporations in Emerging Economies: How the Salim Group Morphed into an Institution of Suharto's Crony Regime , 2008 .

[23]  O. Williamson.  Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It is Headed , 1998 .

[24]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? , 2010 .

[25]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives , 1993 .

[26]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  Port Privatisation: Objectives, Extent, Process, and the UK Experience , 2000 .

[27]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy safari : a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management , 1998 .

[28]  R. Morgan,et al.  Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation , 2003 .

[29]  Eric Gedajlovic,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm Capabilities: A Comparison of Managerial, Alliance, and Personal Capitalisms , 2001 .

[30]  A. Greif.  Commitment, Coercion and Markets: The Nature and Dynamics of Institutions Supporting Exchange , 2005 .

[31]  H. Thorelli.  Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies , 1986 .

[32]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform , 2011 .

[33]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  The Governance Structure of Ports , 2004 .

[34]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[36]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[37]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Devolution, port governance and port performance , 2007 .

[38]  G. Stoker.  Governance as theory: five propositions , 1998 .

[39]  Rob Zuidwijk,et al.  The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports , 2012 .

[40]  John Child,et al.  Co-Evolution in an Institutionalized Environment , 2003 .

[41]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[42]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[43]  J. Cardell.  Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks , 1997 .

[44]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona , 2011 .

[45]  John Child,et al.  Corporate Co-Evolution: A Political Perspective , 2008 .

[46]  H. Meersman,et al.  Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition? , 2000 .

[47]  J. Gómez-Ibáňez.  Alternatives to Infrastructure Privatization Revisited: Public Enterprise Reform from the 1960s to the 1980s , 2007 .

[48]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics , 2010 .

[49]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority , 2013 .

[50]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formulation as a Historical Process , 1977 .

[51]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[52]  P. D. de Langen,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[53]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Governance in Seaport Clusters , 2004 .

[54]  D. Teece.  TRANSACTIONS COST ECONOMICS AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE An Assessment , 1986 .

[55]  S. R. Kole,et al.  Deregulation, the Evolution of Corporate Governance Structure, and Survival , 1997 .

[56]  Bob Johnstone,et al.  Business plan , 1990, Nature.

[57]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[58]  Robert Freeland,et al.  Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives on Corporate Organization , 1995 .

[59]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries , 2010 .

[60]  T. Pallesen,et al.  The Political Benefits of Corporatization and Privatization , 2001, Journal of Public Policy.

[61]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Ensuring Hinterland Access The Role of Port Authorities , 2008 .

[62]  J. Child,et al.  The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co‐Evolution , 2012 .

[63]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Handbook of Strategy and Management , 2001 .

[64]  B. Nooteboom.  Governance and Competence , 2002 .

[65]  S. Rodrigues.  Understanding the Environments of Emerging Markets: The Social Costs of Institutional Voids , 2013 .

[66]  P. Panayides,et al.  Global supply chain and port/terminal: integration and competitiveness , 2008 .

[67]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1987 .

[68]  Pierre Franc,et al.  Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 2010 .

[69]  Photis M. Panayides,et al.  Economic organization of intermodal transport , 2002 .

[70]  Jeffrey A. Alexander,et al.  The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Organizational Change , 2000 .

[71]  J. Barney.  Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[72]  Magali A. Delmas,et al.  Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector , 2005 .

[73]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[74]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Towards an Institution-Based View of Business Strategy , 2002 .

[75]  H. Demsetz.  Toward a Theory of Property Rights II: The Competition between Private and Collective Ownership , 2002, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[76]  N. Foss.  Networks, capabilities, and competitive advantage , 1999 .

[77]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Strategic Change Processes , 2006 .

[78]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis , 2003 .

[79]  M. Geppert,et al.  Different Forms of Agency and Institutional Influences within Multinational Enterprises , 2011 .

[80]  Bob de Wit,et al.  Strategy Synthesis: Resolving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage , 1999 .

[81]  Maria Vagliasindi.  The role of investment and regulatory reforms in the development of infrastructure across transition economies , 2004 .

[82]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[83]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.