One of these greebles is not like the others: Semi-supervised models for similarity structures

When studying human concepts, artificial categories are often used that are very simple, with a chosen set of discrete features. Images such as “greebles”, animal-like three-dimensional figures, are a more realistic and interesting alternative artificial stimulus set for categorization experiments. However, especially for more complex stimuli, it is not obvious that participants’ perceived similarity structure will be as simple as the structure used to construct the stimuli. Therefore, it is safest to first empirically obtain a measure of the stimuli’s structure. We demonstrate the use of an odd one out task in order to model people’s mental representations of a set of greebles, an example set of moderately complex stimuli. We show that, although the greebles were constructed such that they can be classified into two sets of categories, these categories have a considerable amount of additional latent structure that can be extracted by similarity modeling.

[1]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Category representation for classification and feature inference. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A probabilistic approach to semantic representation , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[3]  Bob Rehder,et al.  When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[4]  A. Markman,et al.  Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[6]  M. Lee,et al.  Commonalities and Distinctions in Featural Stimulus Representations , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[8]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[9]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach , 1997 .

[10]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[11]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Behavioral Change and Its Neural Correlates in Visual Agnosia After Expertise Training , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[14]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Nosofsky Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[17]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. , 2002 .

[18]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  Combining Dimensions and Features in Similarity-Based Representations , 2002, NIPS.

[19]  William B Estes,et al.  Similarity , Frequency , and Category Representations , 1988 .

[20]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Latent Features in Similarity Judgments: A Nonparametric Bayesian Approach , 2008, Neural Computation.

[21]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. , 1979 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Additive similarity trees , 1977 .

[23]  M. Lee,et al.  Common and distinctive features in stimulus similarity: A modified version of the contrast model , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  M. Lee,et al.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Woodworth,et al.  Experimental Psychology, 3rd ed , 1957 .