State of the science on alternatives to animal testing and integration of testing strategies for food safety assessments: Workshop proceedings.

Rapidly evolving technological methods and mechanistic toxicological understanding have paved the way for new science-based approaches for the determination of chemical safety in support of advancing public health. Approaches including read-across, high-throughput screening, in silico models, and organ-on-a-chip technologies were addressed in a 2017 workshop focusing on how scientists can move effectively toward a vision for 21st century food safety assessments. The application of these alternative methods, the need for further development of standardized practices, and the interpretation and communication of results were addressed. Expert presentations encompassed regulatory, industry, and academic perspectives, and the workshop culminated in a panel discussion in which participants engaged experts about current issues pertaining to the application of alternative methods in toxicological testing for food safety assessments.

[1]  Barbara A. Wetmore,et al.  Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability. , 2017, Environment international.

[2]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  Alison Kretser,et al.  Insights and Perspectives on Emerging Inputs to Weight of Evidence Determinations for Food Safety: Workshop Proceedings , 2013, International journal of toxicology.

[4]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  Jian Dong,et al.  Editor’s Highlight: Development of an In vitro Assay Measuring Uterine-Specific Estrogenic Responses for Use in Chemical Safety Assessment , 2016, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[7]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  Considering new methodologies in strategies for safety assessment of foods and food ingredients. , 2016, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[8]  J. Dorne,et al.  Metabolism, variability and risk assessment. , 2010, Toxicology.

[9]  D. Ingber,et al.  Reconstituting Organ-Level Lung Functions on a Chip , 2010, Science.

[10]  Imran Shah,et al.  Systematically evaluating read-across prediction and performance using a local validity approach characterized by chemical structure and bioactivity information. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[11]  M. Boland Human digestion--a processing perspective. , 2016, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[12]  Dan D. Petersen,et al.  Application of computational toxicological approaches in human health risk assessment. I. A tiered surrogate approach. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[14]  Richard S Judson,et al.  On selecting a minimal set of in vitro assays to reliably determine estrogen agonist activity , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[15]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Evaluating opportunities for advancing the use of alternative methods in risk assessment through the development of fit-for-purpose in vitro assays. , 2018, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[16]  Fiona Sewell,et al.  Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non-animal Approaches? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[17]  R A Ford,et al.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach. , 1978, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[18]  Anna Lowit,et al.  A new path forward: the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and National Toxicology Program's Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). , 2015, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[19]  Patience Browne,et al.  Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Imran Shah,et al.  Navigating through the minefield of read-across frameworks: A commentary perspective , 2018 .

[21]  Nicholas Ball,et al.  Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[23]  Nicole Kleinstreuer,et al.  Supporting read-across using biological data. , 2016, ALTEX.

[24]  Judy Strickland,et al.  A Curated Database of Rodent Uterotrophic Bioactivity , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Relative impact of incorporating pharmacokinetics on predicting in vivo hazard and mode of action from high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  G Patlewicz,et al.  Building scientific confidence in the development and evaluation of read-across. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[27]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Integrative chemical-biological read-across approach for chemical hazard classification. , 2013, Chemical research in toxicology.

[28]  Imran Shah,et al.  Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping , 2017 .

[29]  Hao Zhu,et al.  t4 report*: Toward Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) Guidance , 2016, ALTEX.

[30]  Richard A Becker,et al.  Use and validation of HT/HC assays to support 21st century toxicity evaluations. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[31]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment. , 2017, Reproductive toxicology.

[32]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing. , 2013, ALTEX.

[33]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Multiple receptors shape the estrogen response pathway and are critical considerations for the future of in vitro-based risk assessment efforts , 2017, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[34]  T W Schultz,et al.  A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[35]  Richard S Judson,et al.  Retrospective mining of toxicology data to discover multispecies and chemical class effects: Anemia as a case study , 2017, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[36]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.