Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives

[1]  William J. McGill.  Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[2]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The relation between information and variance analyses , 1956 .

[3]  P Hougaard.  Statistical decomposition analysis : a conceptual synthesis of a probalistic function , 1982 .

[4]  Long-range strategic planning in Japanese R and D☆ , 1983 .

[5]  B. Martin,et al.  Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners , 1984 .

[6]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Design, innovation and long cycles in economic development , 1986 .

[7]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[8]  R. Wade.  Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[9]  R. Ulanowicz.  Ecology, the ascendent perspective , 1997 .

[10]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[11]  J G Daugman,et al.  Information Theory and Coding , 1998 .

[12]  栄一 長谷川.  本だな 「The Two Koreas--A Contemporary History」 , 1998 .

[13]  Roy W. S hin.  Korea's Science and Technology Policy , 1999 .

[14]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  FAILURE AND SUCCESS : THE FATE OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY IN LATIN AMERICA AND SOUTH EAST ASIA , 1999 .

[15]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, learning, and innovation : experiences of newly industrializing economies , 2000 .

[16]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[17]  Mugyeong Moon,et al.  A case of korean higher education reform: The brain korea 21 project , 2001 .

[18]  Yongsoo Hwang.  TECHNO-ECONOMIC PARADIGM SHIFT AND EVOLUTION OF STI POLICY IN KOREA AND THE UNITED STATES , 2002 .

[19]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Technological Dynamism in Asia , 2002 .

[20]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  A Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge Society , 2002, J. Documentation.

[21]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[22]  Seog Kyeun Kwun,et al.  Public policy toward the innovation-driven economy in Korea , 2003 .

[23]  Ivan Bratko,et al.  Quantifying and Visualizing Attribute Interactions: An Approach Based on Entropy , 2003 .

[24]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' , 2004, 0911.3414.

[26]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[27]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics , 2003, Scientometrics.

[28]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[30]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  A fuzzy set theory approach to national composite S&T indices , 2005, Scientometrics.

[31]  Freiberger Arbeitspapiere,et al.  Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics , 2005 .

[32]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[33]  B. Carlsson.  Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[34]  Yun-Chul Chung,et al.  Managing uncertainty and ambiguity in frontier R&D projects: A Korean case study , 2007 .

[35]  J. Mahlich,et al.  Introduction: Korea as a Newly Advanced Economy and the Role of Technology and Innovation , 2007 .

[36]  Werner Pascha,et al.  Innovation and technology in Korea Challenges of a newly advanced economy , 2007 .

[37]  Roger Burrows,et al.  The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology , 2007, Sociology.

[38]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? , 2008, Scientometrics.

[39]  Yong-Gil Lee,et al.  Patent licensability and life: A study of U.S. patents registered by South Korean public research institutes , 2008, Scientometrics.

[40]  Matthew A. Shapiro.  The Triple Helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new forms of capital , 2007 .

[41]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS , 2008 .

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Configurational Information as Potentially Negative Entropy: The Triple Helix Model , 2008, Entropy.

[43]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development , 2008 .

[44]  Steven W. Popper,et al.  Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Model. Monograph. , 2008 .

[45]  H. Browman,et al.  Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely , 2008 .

[46]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action , 2008 .

[47]  Raymond W. Yeung,et al.  Information Theory and Network Coding , 2008 .

[48]  Apresentação Paulo Bastos Tigre.  Bengt-Åke Lundvall - Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation , 2009 .

[49]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[50]  Mismatch between high R&D capability and low commercialization activity in Korean public sectors: Current status and plans for the future , 2009 .

[51]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  C. Wagner,et al.  The New Invisible College , 2009 .

[53]  S. Ross.  :Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2009 .

[54]  Yuan Sun,et al.  Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan’s national innovation system: a comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators , 2010, Scientometrics.

[55]  Supporting interdisciplinary research, scientific collaboration and policy making: the PolicyGrid II project , 2010 .

[56]  The Rise of e-Science in Asia. Dreams and Realities for Social Science Research: Case Studies of Singapore and South Korea , 2010 .

[57]  R. Trotter.  The Life Cycle of Collaborative Partnerships : evolution of structure and roles in industry-university research networks , 2011 .