Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting

Aims: We assessed COVID-19 epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions in the state of Victoria, Australia - a setting with low community transmission - in line with a national framework that aims to balance sequential policy relaxations with longer-term public health and economic need. Methods: An agent-based model, Covasim, was calibrated to the local COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment. Contact networks were modelled to capture transmission risks in households, schools and workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Policy changes that could prevent or reduce transmission in specific locations (e.g. opening/closing businesses) were modelled in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine. Results: Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk. In the model, epidemic impact following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening, such as >30% population-uptake of a contact-tracing app, physical distancing policies within venues reducing transmissibility by >40%, or patron identification records being kept to enable >60% contact tracing. Conclusions: In a low transmission setting, care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes. These findings have implications for other settings with low community transmission where governments are beginning to lift restrictions.

[1]  Stewart T. Chang,et al.  Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions , 2020, medRxiv.

[2]  Haoyang Sun,et al.  Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[3]  E. McBryde,et al.  Modelling the impact of COVID‐19 on intensive care services in New South Wales , 2020, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[5]  J. McVernon,et al.  Modelling the impact of COVID-19 in Australia to inform transmission reducing measures and health system preparedness , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[7]  C. Macintyre,et al.  The effectiveness of full and partial travel bans against COVID-19 spread in Australia for travellers from China during and after the epidemic peak in China , 2020, medRxiv.

[8]  Ganna Rozhnova,et al.  Isolation and contact tracing can tip the scale to containment of COVID-19 in populations with social distancing , 2020, medRxiv.

[9]  Devabhaktuni Srikrishna,et al.  Modeling layered non-pharmaceutical interventions against SARS-CoV-2 in the United States with Corvid , 2020, medRxiv.

[10]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China , 2020, Science.

[11]  N. Golding,et al.  Early analysis of the Australian COVID-19 epidemic , 2020, medRxiv.

[12]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Modeling the impact of social distancing, testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second-wave scenarios of the COVID-19 epidemic , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Yiu Chung Lau,et al.  Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[15]  G. Milne,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Distancing in Mitigating COVID-19 Spread: a modelling analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[16]  Hannah Fry,et al.  Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[17]  P. Vollmar,et al.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 , 2020, Nature.

[18]  L. Meyers,et al.  The serial interval of COVID-19 from publicly reported confirmed cases , 2020, medRxiv.

[19]  E. McBryde,et al.  Delaying the COVID‐19 epidemic in Australia: evaluating the effectiveness of international travel bans , 2020, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

[20]  Mark Jit,et al.  Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  N. Linton,et al.  Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[22]  Zheng Zhao,et al.  Investigation of three clusters of COVID-19 in Singapore: implications for surveillance and response measures , 2020, The Lancet.

[23]  Hannah R. Meredith,et al.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia , 2020, Nature Communications.