Methods and principles in biomedical ethics

The four principles approach to medical ethics plus specification is used in this paper. Specification is defined as a process of reducing the indeterminateness of general norms to give them increased action guiding capacity, while retaining the moral commitments in the original norm. Since questions of method are central to the symposium, the paper begins with four observations about method in moral reasoning and case analysis. Three of the four scenarios are dealt with. It is concluded in the “standard” Jehovah’s Witness case that having autonomously chosen the authority of his religious institution, a Jehovah’s Witness has a reasonable basis on which to refuse a recommended blood transfusion. The author’s view of the child of a Jehovah’s Witness scenario is that it is morally required—not merely permitted—to overrule this parental refusal of treatment. It is argued in the selling kidneys for transplantation scenario that a fair system of regulating and monitoring would be better than the present system which the author believes to be a shameful failure.

[1]  H. Richardson,et al.  Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles. , 2000, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[2]  R. Hoffenberg,et al.  The case for allowing kidney sales , 1998, The Lancet.

[3]  Robert Arnold,et al.  Ethical incentives--not payment--for organ donation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Mehta,et al.  Economic and health consequences of selling a kidney in India. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  Peter Singer,et al.  A Companion to Bioethics , 2001 .

[6]  L. Cohen Where it hurts: Indian material for an ethics of organ transplantation. , 2003, Daedalus.

[7]  R. Gillon Four scenarios. , 2003, Journal of medical ethics.

[8]  C. Ells A Companion to Bioethics , 2003 .

[9]  D. Joralemon,et al.  Body values: the case against compensating for transplant organs. , 2003, The Hastings Center report.

[10]  John D Arras,et al.  Principles and particularity: the roles of cases in bioethics. , 1994, Indiana law journal.

[11]  D. Degrazia,et al.  Moving forward in bioethical theory: theories, cases, and specified principlism. , 1992, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[12]  S. Maffettone,et al.  Political liberalism , 2004 .

[13]  R. Sade,et al.  Paying for Kidneys: The Case against Prohibition , 2002, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.

[14]  H. Black,et al.  Black's Law Dictionary , 1968 .

[15]  A. Daar,et al.  The Bellagio Task Force report on transplantation, bodily integrity, and the International Traffic in Organs. , 1997, Transplantation proceedings.

[16]  A R Jonsen,et al.  Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics , 1991, Theoretical medicine.

[17]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[18]  S. Gruber,et al.  Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: an ethical reappraisal1 , 2002, Transplantation.

[19]  Bernard Hoose,et al.  The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning , 1991 .