Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Using Energetic Extrapolation: A Systematically Optimized Protocol

ObjectivesEnergetic extrapolation is a promising strategy to reduce metal artifacts in dual-source computed tomography (DSCT). We performed this study to systematically optimize image acquisition parameters for this approach in a hip phantom and assess its value in a clinical study. Materials and MethodsTitanium and steel hip prostheses were placed in a standard hip phantom and a water tank and scanned on a DSCT scanner. Tube spectra, tube current ratio, collimation, pitch, and rotation time were optimized in a stepwise process. Artifacts were quantified by measuring the standard deviation of the computed tomography density in a doughnut-shaped region of interest placed around the prosthesis. A total of 22 adult individuals with metallic implants referred for computed tomography for a musculoskeletal indication were scanned using the optimized protocol. Degree of artifacts and diagnostic image quality were rated visually (0–10) and maximum streak intensity was measured. ResultsSn140/100 kVp proved superior to Sn140/80 kVp. There was a benefit for increasing tube current ratio from 1:1 to 3:1, but not beyond, in favor of the Sn140 kVp spectrum. Artifacts were less severe for a collimation of 32 × 0.6 mm as compared with 40 × 0.6 mm. A pitch of 0.5 at a rotation time of 0.5 seconds per rotation was preferable to other combinations with comparable scanning times. In the clinical study, increasing the extrapolated photon energy from 64 to 120 keV decreased the severity of artifacts from 8.0 to 2.0 (P < 0.001) and decreased streak intensity from 871 to 153 HU (P < 0.001). The median diagnostic image quality rating improved from 2.5 to 8.0 (P < 0.001). The median energy level visually perceived as optimal for diagnostic evaluation was 113 keV (range, 100–130 keV). ConclusionsSn140/100 kVp with a tube current ratio of 3:1, a collimation of 32 × 0.6 mm, and extrapolated energies of 105 to 120 keV are optimal parameters for a dedicated DSCT protocol that effectively reduces metal artifacts by energetic extrapolation. The protocol effectively reduces metal artifacts in all types of metal implants. The optimized reconstructions yielded relevant additional findings.

[1]  Li Xiao,et al.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Imaging of Thyroid Nodule Specimens: Comparison With Pathologic Findings , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Song Luo,et al.  Monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT reduces artifacts from implanted metal orthopedic devices in patients with factures. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[3]  R. Bauer,et al.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Detection of Late Enhancement in Reperfused Chronic Infarction: A Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathology in a Porcine Model , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[4]  D. Fleischmann,et al.  Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Quantification of Liver Fat in the Presence of Iron and Iodine: An Ex-Vivo Dual-Energy CT Study , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[6]  L. Xing,et al.  Metal artifact reduction in x-ray computed tomography (CT) by constrained optimization. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation , 2011, European Radiology.

[8]  M. Owings,et al.  National hospital discharge survey: 2006 annual summary. , 2010, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[9]  Yiannis Kyriakou,et al.  Reducing Metal Artifacts in Computed Tomography Caused by Hip Endoprostheses Using a Physics-Based Approach , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Reiser,et al.  Pulmonary ventilation and perfusion imaging with dual-energy CT , 2010, European Radiology.

[12]  M. Macari,et al.  Single-Phase Dual-Energy CT Allows for Characterization of Renal Masses as Benign or Malignant , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  A novel forward projection-based metal artifact reduction method for flat-detector computed tomography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction From Reformatted Projections for Hip Prostheses in Multislice Helical Computed Tomography: Techniques and Initial Clinical Results , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Christianne Leidecker,et al.  Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  Maximilian F Reiser,et al.  Cervical and Cranial Computed Tomographic Angiography With Automated Bone Removal: Dual Energy Computed Tomography Versus Standard Computed Tomography , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[17]  M. Reiser,et al.  The Value of Dual-Energy Bone Removal in Maximum Intensity Projections of Lower Extremity Computed Tomography Angiography , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[18]  David Faul,et al.  Suppression of Metal Artifacts in CT Using a Reconstruction Procedure That Combines MAP and Projection Completion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Tobias Funk,et al.  Computed Tomographic Metal Artifact Reduction for the Detection and Quantitation of Small Features Near Large Metallic Implants: A Comparison of Published Methods , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical Experience , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[21]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[22]  Yong-Min Huh,et al.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[23]  Lothar Spies,et al.  Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. , 2006, Medical physics.

[24]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[25]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[26]  W. Kalender,et al.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. , 2001, Medical physics.

[27]  P. J. Hodes.  Advances in diagnostic radiology. , 1970, Postgraduate medicine.

[28]  J. Hsieh,et al.  An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. , 2000, Medical physics.