A new approach to collection bias in academic libraries: The extent of corporate control in journal holdings

Abstract Questions of collection bias in library journal collections usually turn on a left-right political contrast. This article presents another approach that distinguishes between corporate and non-corporate controlled publications. Using this method, the catalog holdings of all Canadian academic libraries were searched to determine the penetration of socio-political titles of mainstream “corporate publishers” and those of “small publishers.” Canadian academic libraries privilege, by a wide margin, mainstream titles published by corporate entities, although some libraries have impressive “small publisher” collections. This article also analyzed the availability of mainstream and small publisher journals provided by ten popular electronic vendors. These vendors provide very low access to non-corporate “small publisher” titles while covering 100% of surveyed mainstream titles. The implications of such provision rates are examined from the perspective of the scholarly browsing process and the role of the university.

[1]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[2]  R. Ohmann,et al.  Selling Culture: Magazines, Markets and Class at the Turn of the Century , 1996 .

[3]  Reva Basch ProQuest direct: document delivery (with images) to the desktop , 1996 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media , 1988 .

[5]  Joost Dijkstra,et al.  Ariadne: the next generation of electronic document delivery systems , 1994 .

[6]  Ken Rouse The serials crisis in the age of electronic access , 1997 .

[7]  Joseph Turow,et al.  Media Systems in Society: Understanding Industries, Strategies, and Power , 1996 .

[8]  S. Hupp The left and the right: a follow-up survey of the collection of journals of political opinion in Ohio libraries , 1994 .

[9]  B. C. Walsh,et al.  Browsing as a means of online text retrieval , 1987 .

[10]  L. Kane Access vs. Ownership: Do We Have to Make a Choice? , 1997 .

[11]  E. Carpenter,et al.  Commentaries on Collection Bias , 1995 .

[12]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  A Principle of Uncertainty for Information seeking , 1993, J. Documentation.

[13]  Anna Grzeszkiewicz,et al.  Investigating a full-text journal database: a case of detection , 1996 .

[14]  S. Hupp The Left and the Right: A Preliminary Study of Bias in Collection Development in Ohio Libraries , 1991 .

[15]  B. Bagdikian,et al.  The Media Monopoly , 1984 .

[16]  Jan Olsen Electronic Journal Literature: Implications for Scholars , 1994 .

[17]  C. Levitt,et al.  "The Whole World Is Watching": Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left , 1981 .

[18]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Validating a Model of the Search Process: A Comparison of Academic, Public and School Library Users. , 1990 .

[19]  Benjamin M. Compaine,et al.  Who owns the media? : concentration of ownership in the mass communications industry , 1979 .

[20]  Bill Katz,et al.  Magazines for Libraries , 1969 .

[21]  O. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[22]  S. Ewen,et al.  Captains Of Consciousness Advertising And The Social Roots Of The Consumer Culture , 1978 .

[23]  Robert Goldman,et al.  Reading Ads Socially. , 1992 .

[24]  Dave Harmeyer,et al.  Potential Collection Development Bias: Some Evidence on a Controversial Topic in California , 1995 .

[25]  J. H. Altschull Agents of Power: The Media and Public Policy , 1994 .