Effects of Practice and Learner Control on Short-and Long-Term Gain and Efficiency

This study investigated the effects of practice opportunities and learner control on short- and long-term learning from a computer-based introductory statistics curriculum. In all, 380 participants were assigned to one of five conditions. The first four conditions differed in terms of the number of problems to solve per problem set. The fifth condition allowed learners to choose the amount of practice. A subset (n = 120) of the original participants returned for testing following a six-month interval. Overall, the fixed-practice conditions showed learning gains that varied in relation to the amount of practice (i.e., more was better). The data from the learner-control condition was unexpected, showing learning gains comparable with the most extended practice condition yet the fastest tutor-completion times. We discuss implications of these findings in relation to the design of efficacious instruction. Actual or potential applications of this research include the modification of computer-based instruction that can enhance individuals′ learning efficiency and outcome scores.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[2]  E. R. Steinberg.  Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[4]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[5]  S. Macgregor,et al.  Instructional Design for Computer-Mediated Text Systems: Effects of Motivation, Learner Control, and Collaboration on Reading Pedformance , 1988 .

[6]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task , 1983 .

[7]  Lee Rivers.  Development and Assessment of an Adaptive Strategy Utilizing Regression Analysis Techniques for the Presentation of Instruction via Computer. , 1972 .

[8]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[9]  M. Hannafin,et al.  The Effect of the Locus of CAI Control Strategies on the Learning of Mathematics Rules , 1985 .

[10]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Learner Control versus Program Control in Interactive Videodisc Instruction: What Are the Effects in Procedural Learning?. , 1992 .

[11]  E. Thorndike.  “Animal Intelligence” , 1898, Nature.

[12]  Richard E. Hurlock.  Student Controlled Versus Program Controlled CAI. , 1974 .

[13]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction , 1980 .

[14]  S.-S. Lee,et al.  Adaptive program vs. learner control strategy on computer aided learning of gravimetric stoichiometry problems , 1989 .

[15]  Carol L. Tennyson,et al.  Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition , 1980 .

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[17]  John C. Belland,et al.  Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences? , 1985 .

[18]  M. Lepper.  Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. , 1985 .

[19]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Practice Effects on Skill Acquisition, Learning Outcome, Retention, and Sensitivity to Relearning , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control , 1989 .

[21]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation , 1990 .

[22]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[23]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Interactive effect of information structure sequence of information and process learning time on rule learning using computer-based instruction , 1985 .

[24]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI , 1989 .

[25]  Lowe Bryan William,et al.  Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. , 1899 .

[26]  Dean L. Christensen,et al.  Adaptive Control of Learning Time and Content Sequence in Concept Learning Using Computer-Based Instruction. , 1985 .

[27]  R. Tennyson.  Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. , 1980 .

[28]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  Do Learners Make Good Choices , 1984 .

[29]  George F. Lahey.  Post Lesson Remediation and Student Control of Branching in Computer Based Training. , 1973 .

[30]  Gayle V. Davidson,et al.  Computer-Based Adaptive Instruction: Effects of Learner Control on Concept Learning. , 1991 .

[31]  David W. Dalton.  The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video , 1990 .

[32]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction , 1984 .

[33]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[34]  Seong-Soo Lee,et al.  Effects of Learner-Control versus Program-Control Strategies on Computer-Aided Learning of Chemistry Problems: For Acquisition or Review?. , 1991 .

[35]  M. Merrill.  Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions , 1975 .