LTE-V2X Mode 4: Increasing Robustness and DCC Compatibility with Reservation Splitting

IEEE 802.11p (ITS-G5 in Europe) and LTE-V2X are the dominant wireless access technologies for vehicle-to-vehicle communication. While the former has been extensively tested and evaluated for years, the cellular approach is relatively new. Previous research reported safety-critical issues of the distributed MAC mode such as re-occurring packet collisions, caused by repeated resource reuse due to the semi-persistent scheduling (SPS). While the evaluation of LTE-V2X is in its early stages, modifications and additions are simultaneously being released. The ETSI recently published a distributed congestion control (DCC) mechanism to limit the channel load and ensure that the random-access based MAC protocol can work as intended. By dropping packets and reducing the predictability of resource allocations achieved by SPS, this DCC mechanism raises concerns about the compatibility with the MAC protocol. In this paper, we present a modification to the MAC protocol that limits the impact of re-occurring collisions while retaining the benefits of SPS. Additionally, the proposed modification allows to implement an improved DCC version, which is better compatible with the MAC protocol of LTE-V2X. The modifications and DCC variant are evaluated in a system-level simulation and show significant benefits compared to the standard-compliant versions.

[1]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Measurement based Shadow Fading Model for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Network Simulations , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  Lars C. Wolf,et al.  Artery: Extending Veins for VANET applications , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[3]  Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub,et al.  Multiple Access in Cellular V2X: Performance Analysis in Highly Congested Vehicular Networks , 2018, 2018 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[4]  Reinhard German,et al.  Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[5]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V in-coverage and out-of-coverage for cooperative awareness , 2017, 2017 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[6]  Jérôme Härri,et al.  A First Investigation of Congestion Control for LTE-V2X Mode 4 , 2019, 2019 15th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[7]  Matthias A. Hein,et al.  Cooperative Passive Coherent Location: A Promising 5G Service to Support Road Safety , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Reiner S. Thomä,et al.  An application-oriented evaluation of LTE-V's mode 4 for V2V communication , 2019, SAC.

[9]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility An Overview , 2011 .

[10]  Thomas Engel,et al.  Ieee Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine @bullet 52 @bullet Summer 2017 Luxembourg Sumo Traffic (lust) Scenario: Traffic Demand Evaluation , 2022 .

[11]  Miguel Sepulcre,et al.  Analytical Models of the Performance of C-V2X Mode 4 Vehicular Communications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.