Biaxial mechanical/structural effects of equibiaxial strain during crosslinking of bovine pericardial xenograft materials.

We have investigated the effect of biaxial constraint during glutaraldehyde crosslinking on the equibiaxial mechanical properties of bovine pericardium. Crosslinking of cruciate samples was carried out with: (i) no applied load, (ii) an initial 25 g ( approximately 30 kPa) equibiaxial load, or (iii) an initial 200 g (approximately 250 kPa) equibiaxial load. All loading during crosslinking was done under a defined initial equibiaxial load and subsequently fixed biaxial strain. Load changes during crosslinking were monitored. Mechanical testing and constraint during crosslinking were carried out in a custom-built biaxial servo-hydraulic testing system incorporating four actuators with phase-controlled waveform synthesis, high frame-rate video dimension analysis, and computer-interfaced data acquisition. The paired biaxial stress strain responses under equibiaxial loading at 1 Hz (before and after treatment) were evaluated for changes in anisotropic extensibility by calculation of an anisotropy index. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on freeze-fractured samples to relate collagen crimp morphology to constraint during crosslinking. Fresh tissue was markedly anisotropic with the base-to-apex direction of the pericardium being less extensible and stiffer than the circumferential direction. After unconstrained crosslinking, the extensibility in the circumferential direction, the stiffness in the base-to-apex direction, and the tissue's anisotropy were all reduced. Anisotropy was preserved in the tissue treated with an applied 25 g load; however, tissue treated with an applied 200 g load became extremely stiff and nearly isotropic. SEM micrographs correlated well with observed extensibility in that the collagen fibre morphology changed from very crimped (unconstrained crosslinking), to straight (200 g applied load). Biaxial stress-fixation may allow engineering of bioprosthetic materials for specific medical applications.

[1]  A A Sauren,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[3]  J C Barbenel,et al.  Mechanics of native bovine pericardium. I. The multiangular behaviour of strength and stiffness of the tissue. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[4]  E A Trowbridge,et al.  Pericardial heterografts: why do these valves fail? , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  B. Meyns,et al.  Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. , 1994, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[6]  J Fisher,et al.  Determination of the Curvatures and Bending Strains in Open Trileaflet Heart Valves , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  C B Frank,et al.  Calibration characteristics of a video dimension analyser (VDA) system. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Y Lanir,et al.  Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. I. Experimental system. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  D R Boughner,et al.  Glutaraldehyde fixation alters the internal shear properties of porcine aortic heart valve tissue. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Y C Fung,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of the pericardium in normal and volume overload dogs. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  R. van Noort,et al.  The physical properties of bovine pericardium: a study of the effects of stretching during chemical treatment in glutaraldehyde. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Thickness measurement of soft tissue biomaterials: a comparison of five methods. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  E. Trowbridge,et al.  The standardisation of gauge length: its influence on the relative extensibility of natural and chemically modified pericardium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W. Roberts,et al.  Structure of bovine parietal pericardium and of unimplanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valvular bioprostheses. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  G. Christie,et al.  Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[16]  V. Walley,et al.  Valve failure caused by cusp tears in low-profile Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valves. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  F. J. Thomson,et al.  Influence of fixation conditions on the performance of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valves: towards a more scientific basis. , 1979, Thorax.

[18]  J Fisher,et al.  Primary tissue failure in pericardial heart valves. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  D R Boughner,et al.  The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[20]  G. Christie,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of explanted aortic allograft leaflets. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  P. Lawford,et al.  Pericardial heterografts. Toward quality control of the mechanical properties of glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Scanning and light microscopy of human aortic leaflets in stressed and relaxed states. , 1974, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  E A Trowbridge,et al.  The tensile strength of natural and chemically modified bovine pericardium. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  C. A. Pereira,et al.  A multi-sample denaturation temperature tester for collagenous biomaterials. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  N. Broom,et al.  Simultaneous morphological and stress-strain studies of the fibrous components in wet heart valve leaflet tissue. , 1978, Connective tissue research.

[26]  J M Lee,et al.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: II. Effect of tethering or pressurization during fixation on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  D. Simionescu,et al.  Mapping of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium and tissue selection for bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  I Vesely,et al.  Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  An emergency physician's guide to prosthetic heart valves: identification and hemodynamic function. , 1988, Annals of emergency medicine.

[30]  F. Yin,et al.  Biaxial mechanical behavior of excised porcine mitral valve leaflets. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[31]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Stresses of natural versus prosthetic aortic valve leaflets in vivo. , 1980, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  M. Marchand,et al.  The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[33]  D. Chachra,et al.  Effect of applied uniaxial stress on rate and mechanical effects of cross-linking in tissue-derived biomaterials. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[34]  A. Wiegner,et al.  Mechanical and Structural Correlates of Canine Pericardium , 1981, Circulation research.

[35]  R P Vito,et al.  The mechanical properties of soft tissues--I: a mechanical system for bi-axial testing. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  V. Ferrans,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of bioprosthetic heart valve biomechanical properties and collagen crimp length. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  D R Boughner,et al.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: I. Effect of fixation in aldehydes without constraint on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[38]  B H Smaill,et al.  An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[39]  F J Schoen,et al.  Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses, 1980 to 1983. , 1985, Human pathology.

[40]  V. Walley,et al.  Long-term experience with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[41]  M. Sacks,et al.  Collagen fiber architecture of bovine pericardium. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[42]  J. Barbenel,et al.  Mechanics of native bovine pericardium. II. A structure based model for the anisotropic mechanical behaviour of the tissue. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[43]  J M Lee,et al.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: III. Effect of uniaxial and sequential biaxial stress during fixation on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.