Psychological Profile of Sasang Typology: A Systematic Review

A systematic review of studies related to the psychological characteristics of Sasang types was conducted with the goal of delineating generalizable psychological profiles based on Sasang typology, a traditional Korean medical typology with medical herbs and acupuncture that is characterized as personalized medicine. Journal articles pertaining to Sasang typology were collected using five electronic database systems in Korea and in the USA. As a result, 64 potentially relevant studies were identified and 21 peer-reviewed research articles that employed psychometric inventories were included. Beginning with the use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in 1992, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, NEO-Personality Inventory, Temperament and Character Inventory and other personality assessment tools were employed in the identified studies. Because data synthesis could not be carried out due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the present review article sought to delineate the mutual relevance of the studies based on research results pertaining to the correlation between the aforementioned psychological assessment instruments. Results of the review indicate that two super-factors, Extraversion and Neuroticism, serve as the foundation in regards to delineating personality constructs, such that the So-Yang type scored high on the Extraversion dimension and low on the Neuroticism dimension, while the So-Eum type scored low on the Extraversion dimension and high on the Neuroticism dimension. The present systematic review indicates that Sasang typology shares similarities with the Western psychological tradition.

[1]  B. Coid,et al.  GENES AND ENVIRONMENT IN PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT , 1995 .

[2]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model , 1998 .

[3]  Scott Hershberger,et al.  Genes and environment in personality development , 1994 .

[4]  A. Furnham.  The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality , 1996 .

[5]  K. Bradway,et al.  Jung's Psychological Types , 1964 .

[6]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  The temperament and character inventory (TCI) : a guide to its development and use , 1994 .

[7]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: evidence of the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[8]  조윤성,et al.  Study of Personality Traits in So-yang, So-eum and Tae-eum Using NEO-PI-R , 2005 .

[9]  Lee Anna Clark,et al.  Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. , 1999 .

[10]  F. Chiappelli,et al.  Evidence-based Research in Complementary and Alternative Medicine I: History , 2005, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[11]  J. Gray,et al.  The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. , 1970, Behaviour research and therapy.

[12]  Young-Woo Kim,et al.  A Clinical Study of the Type of Disease and Symptom according to Sasang Constitution Classification , 1999 .

[13]  H. Eysenck.  Biological Basis of Personality , 1963, Nature.

[14]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  The five-factor model of personality : theoretical perspectives , 1996 .

[15]  C. R. Cloninger,et al.  A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. , 1986, Psychiatric developments.

[16]  P. Costa,et al.  Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[17]  Kyu-Kon Kim,et al.  Sasangin diagnosis questionnaire: test of reliability. , 2007, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[18]  C. Robert Cloninger.  A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. , 1987, Archives of general psychiatry.

[19]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[20]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[21]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[22]  Cloninger Cr.  A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. , 1987 .

[23]  Byung-Hee Koh,et al.  A Study on the Sasang Constitutional Distribution Among the People in the United States of America , 1999 .

[24]  S. Park,et al.  Temperament and Character Profiles of Sasang Typology in an Adult Clinical Sample , 2011, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[25]  R. McCrae,et al.  The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings. , 1991, Journal of personality assessment.

[26]  D. MacDonald,et al.  Examination of the Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory , 1994 .

[27]  K. Lesch,et al.  Genes for personality traits: implications for psychopathology. , 1998, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[28]  Cloninger Cr.  Discussions arising from: Cloninger, CR. A. unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. , 1987, Psychiatric developments.

[29]  Hyunsu Bae,et al.  An alternative way to individualized medicine: psychological and physical traits of Sasang typology. , 2003, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[30]  L. A. Pervin.  Personality: Theory and Research , 1984 .