Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND/AIM Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a non-invasive diagnostic procedure whose role in the management of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of MRC in the evaluation of the biliary tree in patients with suspected biliary disease, and in particular, PSC. METHODS MRC and invasive cholangiography (ERCP or PTC) were both performed in 73 patients, (33 male, 40 female, mean age 56 years) with clinical and/or biochemical evidence of cholestasis. Images were interpreted by two radiologists unaware of the results of other studies. RESULTS Forty-two patients (58%) had benign biliary disease, including 23 patients (32%) with PSC; 9 patients (12%) had malignant biliary disease; and 22 patients (30%) had a normal biliary tree. Diagnostic quality images were obtained in 73/73 (100%) of MRC, and in 70/73 (96%) of invasive cholangiography (68 ERCP's, 2 PTC's) procedures. Using ERCP/PTC findings as the reference standard, MRC had an accuracy greater than 90% in the diagnosis of normal bile ducts, biliary dilatation, biliary obstruction, bile duct stones, and PSC. Using the final diagnosis, MRC had an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90% in the detection of biliary disease compared to 97% for invasive cholangiography. Additional diagnostic/therapeutic interventions were performed during ERCP in 73% of patients with PSC and in 43% of patients without PSC (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS MRC has excellent diagnostic accuracy in the presence of biliary disease. Because of its noninvasive nature, MRC may have advantages over invasive cholangiography when diagnosis is the major goal of the procedure.

[1]  A. Barkun,et al.  Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  R Felix,et al.  Clinical Significance of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Compared to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) , 1997, Endoscopy.

[3]  J. Soto,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[4]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  D. Sautereau,et al.  Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases , 1998, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[6]  F Regan,et al.  MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  K. Dewbury,et al.  Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy , 1991, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[8]  F Regan,et al.  Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  C. Dotter,et al.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. , 1976, Gastroenterology.

[10]  M Paley,et al.  MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  P Pikkarainen,et al.  Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the Diagnosis of Choledochal Stones , 1992, Acta radiologica.

[12]  A. Shimakawa,et al.  Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Reiser,et al.  Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  D. Zimmon,et al.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Analysis of 300 consecutive cases. , 1975, Gastroenterology.

[15]  Y Ishizaki,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.