Espbase: A microsoft access tool for selecting symbol and icon sets for usability

The ESPbase provides a tool for storing symbols and icons along with information about their characteristics. Information about a wide range of symbol characteristics is included on the database to facilitate the selection of symbol sets for research and design. The database includes information about the graphical characteristics and functions of symbols. It also includes ratings of symbol concreteness, complexity, familiarity, and meaningfulness. Symbols and icons can be accessed on the basis of each of these characteristics or any combination of characteristics. This makes it easier to select symbols on the basis of usability and design requirements. It also means that symbols can be easily selected for research while controlling their characteristics on a number of dimensions.

[1]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Pictorial communication of abstract verbs in relation to human-computer interaction , 1987 .

[2]  Mary C. Dyson.  How do you describe a symbol?: The problems involved in retrieving symbols from a database , 1992 .

[3]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[4]  Donna L. Cuomo,et al.  Evaluation of a Proposed Space and Missile Warning Symbology Standard for Graphical Displays , 1991 .

[5]  Regine Martein,et al.  Norms for name and concept agreement, familiarity, visual complexity and image agreement on a set of 216 pictures. , 1995 .

[6]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Shape Measures for Content Based Image Retrieval: A Comparison , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Oscar de Bruijn,et al.  Understanding what makes icons effective: how subjective ratings can inform design , 1998 .

[9]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .

[10]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[11]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the meaningfulness of icon sets to represent command operations , 1986 .

[14]  Ralph E. Geiselman,et al.  Perceptual Discriminability as a Basis for Selecting Graphic Symbols , 1982 .

[15]  J. Benjafield,et al.  Imagery, concreteness, goodness, and familiarity ratings for 500 proverbs sampled from theOxford Dictionary of English Proverbs , 1993 .

[16]  Udo Arend,et al.  Evidence for global feature superiority in menu selection by icons , 1987 .

[17]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Iconic interfacing: The role of icon distinctiveness and fixed or variable screen locations , 1990, INTERACT.

[18]  Rb Stammers,et al.  Transfer between Icon Sets and Ratings of Icon Concreteness and Appropriateness , 1991 .

[19]  Christian Mazza.  Neural-net inference and content addressable memory , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[20]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Development and Validation of Icons Varying in their Abstractness , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[21]  William K. Horton,et al.  The Icon Book: Visual Symbols for Computer Systems and Documentation , 1994 .

[22]  David Gittins,et al.  Icon-Based Human-Computer Interaction , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  Iconic Reference: Evolving Perspectives and an Organizing Framework , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Martin B. Curry,et al.  Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: Norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  Zhi-Qiang Liu,et al.  Structured Image Retrieval , 1997, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[26]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .