Stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment require new ways of thinking.

OBJECTIVES There is substantial variation in the design of stepped wedge trials. Many recruit participants continuously over time, although the methodological literature has tended not to differentiate closely between continuous recruitment and discrete sampling. We argue for a deeper understanding of the special features of stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING This is a commentary and informal review. RESULTS We discuss the scheduling of recruitment and implementation in continuous time and how contamination might be avoided. We also offer some suggestions on reporting and terminology for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and comment on issues for analysis. CONCLUSION Repeated cross-section and continuous recruitment stepped wedge trials are not the same thing. More work is needed to develop the theory and practice of stepped wedge designs with continuous recruitment. Thoughtful approaches to design and clarity of reporting are vital.

[1]  I. Arts,et al.  The stepped wedge design does not inherently have more power than a cluster randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  Kelsey L. Grantham,et al.  Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment , 2019, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  R J Lilford,et al.  The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain: design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial , 2013, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[5]  M. Kanaan,et al.  Response to Keriel-Gascou et al. Addressing assumptions on the stepped wedge randomized trial design. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  D. Gerritsen,et al.  Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  M. Campbell,et al.  Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  J. Wason,et al.  Stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design features , 2017, Trials.

[9]  Noreen D Mdege,et al.  There are some circumstances where the stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable to the alternative: no randomized trial at all. Response to the commentary by Kotz and colleagues. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Celia A Taylor nee Brown,et al.  Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  Researchers should convince policy makers to perform a classic cluster randomized controlled trial instead of a stepped wedge design when an intervention is rolled out. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  A. Khalil,et al.  Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[14]  Laura C Fitton,et al.  Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. , 2019, Lancet.

[15]  M. Hillsdon,et al.  The Devon Active Villages Evaluation (DAVE) trial of a community-level physical activity intervention in rural south-west England: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[16]  Karla Hemming,et al.  The efficiency of stepped wedge vs. cluster randomized trials: stepped wedge studies do not always require a smaller sample size. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Karla Hemming,et al.  Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  A. Girling,et al.  Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are efficient and provide a method of evaluation without which some interventions would not be evaluated. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Karla Hemming,et al.  Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  M. Rabilloud,et al.  A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is preferable for assessing complex health interventions. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  Gianluca Baio,et al.  Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014 , 2015, Trials.

[22]  J. Hughes,et al.  Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[23]  M. Taljaard,et al.  Systematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials , 2016, BMJ Open.

[24]  Gianluca Baio,et al.  Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches , 2015, Trials.

[25]  Steven Teerenstra,et al.  The stepped wedge cluster randomized trial always requires fewer clusters but not always fewer measurements, that is, participants than a parallel cluster randomized trial in a cross-sectional design. In reply. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  S. Wigers,et al.  Evaluation of a structured goal planning and tailored follow-up programme in rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic diseases: protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[27]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  Use of the stepped wedge design cannot be recommended: a critical appraisal and comparison with the classic cluster randomized controlled trial design. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  L. Bourke,et al.  Cluster randomised trials with repeated cross sections: alternatives to parallel group designs , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  S. Wigers,et al.  Structured Goal Planning and Supportive Telephone Follow‐up in Rheumatology Care: Results From a Pragmatic, Stepped‐Wedge, Cluster‐Randomized Trial , 2018, Arthritis care & research.

[30]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Effect of Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  Xiaomei Liao,et al.  "Cross-sectional" stepped wedge designs always reduce the required sample size when there is no time effect. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  R. Lilford,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Stepped Wedge Trial Design: a Systematic Review , 2022 .

[34]  Karla Hemming,et al.  Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[35]  Andrew Forbes,et al.  Time Parameterizations in Cluster Randomized Trial Planning , 2020, The American Statistician.

[36]  K Hemming,et al.  Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials , 2019, Statistical methods in medical research.