Role of Soil Thermal Inertia in Surface Temperature and Soil Moisture‐Temperature Feedback

A conceptual model based on the surface energy budget is developed to compute the sensitivity of the climatological mean diurnal amplitude and mean daily surface temperature to the soil thermal inertia. It uses the diurnal amplitude of the net surface radiation, the sensitivity of the turbulent fluxes to the surface temperature and the soil thermal inertia. Its performance is evaluated globally with numerical simulations using the atmospheric and the land surface modules of a state-of-the-art climate model. The only regions where the thermal inertia has a limited impact are the moist regions. In dry areas, together with the stability of the boundary layer it plays a major role. It also has a significant impact at high and midlatitudes especially in winter when the turbulent fluxes are weak. In semiarid regions, the soil moisture exhibits a high day-today variability strongly correlated to the evaporation and the day-today variability of the surface temperature is generally explained by the soil moisture via its control on the evaporation. However, the soil moisture via its control on the thermal inertia reduces the impact of the daytime evaporative cooling by reducing the nocturnal cooling. This newly identified moisture-related negative feedback can reduce the variability of the surface temperature in semiarid regions by up to a factor of 2. The model also provides a simple framework to understand the role of the thermal properties in the frequent cold bias identified in stratified stable atmospheric situations in the northern midlatitudes.

[1]  Jan Polcher,et al.  Sensitivity of the West African hydrological cycle in ORCHIDEE to infiltration processes , 2008 .

[2]  S. Ghan,et al.  Constraining the influence of natural variability to improve estimates of global aerosol indirect effects in a nudged version of the Community Atmosphere Model 5 , 2012 .

[3]  F. Hourdin,et al.  A Thermal Plume Model for the Convective Boundary Layer : Representation of Cumulus Clouds , 2008 .

[4]  S. Bony,et al.  Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[5]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[6]  J. Wang,et al.  A simple method for the estimation of thermal inertia , 2010 .

[7]  R. Koster,et al.  Observational evidence that soil moisture variations affect precipitation , 2003 .

[8]  A. Holtslag,et al.  The role of snow‐surface coupling, radiation, and turbulent mixing in modeling a stable boundary layer over Arctic sea ice , 2013 .

[9]  C. Taylor,et al.  Afternoon rain more likely over drier soils , 2012, Nature.

[10]  Ann M. Fridlind,et al.  Control of deep convection by sub-cloud lifting processes: the ALP closure in the LMDZ5B general circulation model , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[11]  P. Bechtold,et al.  Why is it so difficult to represent stably stratified conditions in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models? , 2013 .

[12]  Jean-Charles Dupont,et al.  Combined influence of atmospheric physics and soil hydrology on the simulated meteorology at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[13]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Assessment of physical parameterizations using a global climate model with stretchable grid and nudging , 2007 .

[14]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Impact of modified soil thermal characteristic on the simulated monsoon climate over south Asia , 2014, Journal of Earth System Science.

[15]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  Climate Forcings and Climate Sensitivities Diagnosed from Coupled Climate Model Integrations , 2006 .

[16]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[17]  Tetsuji Yamada,et al.  Simulations of Nocturnal Drainage Flows by a q2l Turbulence Closure Model , 1983 .

[18]  J. Boé Modulation of soil moisture–precipitation interactions over France by large scale circulation , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[19]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Impact of a physically based soil water flow and soil-plant interaction representation for modeling large-scale land surface processes , 2002 .

[20]  S. Newcomb Phenomena of Contact , 1871, Nature.

[21]  M. Best,et al.  Revisiting GLACE: Understanding the Role of the Land Surface in Land–Atmosphere Coupling , 2012 .

[22]  Fuxing Wang,et al.  The improvement of soil thermodynamics and its effects on land surface meteorology in the IPSL climate model , 2015 .

[23]  S. Bony,et al.  LMDZ5B: the atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[24]  Frédéric Hourdin,et al.  The role of thermal inertia in the representation of mean and diurnal range of surface temperature in semiarid and arid regions , 2015 .

[25]  J. Louis A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[26]  Christa D. Peters-Lidard,et al.  Diagnosing the Nature of Land-Atmosphere Coupling: A Case Study of Dry/Wet Extremes , 2012 .

[27]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layers and Diurnal Cycles: Challenges for Weather and Climate Models , 2013 .