Preffered information quality factors as a web content quality measures on malaysian government websites: A conceptual paper

This paper explores the dimensions of web content quality in Malaysian government website. In addition, throughout the overwhelming growth of information usage on the online medium, it's become a question whether quality of information influence user to be loyal at the authoritative or organizational website. Web content quality widely measured as part of web site quality assessments. The four groups of identifying dimensions of web content quality based on information quality model are intrinsic information quality (IQ), contextual information quality (IQ), representational information quality (IQ) and accessibility information quality (IQ). Intrinsic IQ are included Reliability, accuracy, Objectivity and believability. The representational IQ measured in term of conciseness, completeness, consistency and understandability. A third group of IQ, which accessibility measured in detail in term accessibility, usability, efficiency and security while the last group of IQ, which is contextual assessed for currency, uniqueness, relevancy and scope/depth. The proposed framework is expected to have judgments and validations from the researchers to further conduct of the study.

[1]  Andrew Cox.  Web site design and content management , 2001 .

[2]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[4]  J. Valacich,et al.  A structural model of the relationships between sport website quality, e-satisfaction, and e-loyalty. , 2011 .

[5]  Masnizah Mohd,et al.  Is Data Quality an Influential Factor on Web Portals’ Visibility?☆ , 2013 .

[6]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  Website quality in government: Exploring the webmaster's perception and explanation of website quality , 2013 .

[7]  Mohammad Javad Kargar.  A Content Management System for Building Quality Blogs , 2011 .

[8]  Kalpana Chauhan,et al.  Role of content strategy in social media brand communities: a case of higher education institutes in India , 2013 .

[9]  Neeta Verma,et al.  Guidelines for Indian government websites: standards for enhancing web usability , 2009, ICEGOV '09.

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Jamie Carlson,et al.  An empirical assessment of consumers' evaluations of web site service quality: conceptualizing and testing a formative model , 2012 .

[12]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Manage Your Information as a Product , 1998 .

[13]  Clay Andres.  Great Web Architecture , 1999 .

[14]  Li Zhao,et al.  Information quality and community municipal portal use , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Information quality dimensions for the social web , 2012, MEDES.

[16]  U. Eze,et al.  Intention to Use E-Government Services in Malaysia: Perspective of Individual Users , 2011 .

[17]  Shaun Pather,et al.  The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Adel M. Aladwani.  The Relationship between Portal Quality and Citizens' Acceptance: The Case of the Kuwaiti e-Government , 2013, WorldCIST.

[19]  Chung-Chi Hsieh,et al.  Assessing blog-user satisfaction using the expectation and disconfirmation approach , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[21]  Wan Abdul Rahim Wan Mohd Isa,et al.  Assessing the Usability and Accessibility of Malaysia E-Government Website , 2011 .

[22]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C DRAFT Proposed Recommendation , 1999 .

[23]  Janice Redish.  Content as Conversation in Government Websites , 2013, HCI.

[24]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Kallol Kumar Bagchi,et al.  An assessment of customers' e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  Adel M. Aladwani.  An empirical test of the link between web site quality and forward enterprise integration with web consumers , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  Laurel A. Clyde.  A strategic planning approach to Web site management , 2000, Electron. Libr..

[29]  Shirlee-ann Knight,et al.  User perceptions of information quality in world wide web information retrieval behaviour , 2007 .