Pollen percentages, tree abundances and the Fagerlind effect

Pollen diagrams traditionally are read as if pollen percentages were linearly related to relative tree abundances, although the slopes and intercepts of these relationships are accepted to differ among taxa. Corresponding map patterns of modern pollen and tree percentages support this assumption of linearity, which also underlies the use of linear regression on percentage data for pollen-tree calibration. Fagerlind, however, showed that the theoretical relationship need not be linear and may be confounded by interdependencies among taxa. Regressions and scatter plots of modern pollen and tree percentages are here compared with results of extended R-value (ERV) models, which correct for the ‘Fagerlind effect’. Three data sets from Wisconsin and Michigan, USA illustrate that regression coefficients provide a first approximation to their ERV equivalents, but scatter plots derived from the ERV analyses show reduced scatter about linearised relationships.

[1]  Lain Colin Prentice Modern pollen spectra from lake sediments in Finland and Finnmark, north Norway , 2008 .

[2]  T. Webb,,et al.  Relationships between Contemporary Pollen and Vegetation Data from Wisconsin and Michigan, USA , 1985 .

[3]  B. Huntley,et al.  Atlas of Mapped Distributions of Dominance and Modern Pollen Percentages for Important Tree Taxa of Eastern North America. , 1985 .

[4]  I. Prentice Pollen Representation, Source Area, and Basin Size: Toward a Unified Theory of Pollen Analysis , 1985, Quaternary Research.

[5]  A. D. Gordon,et al.  Statistical uncertainty in forest composition estimates obtained from fossil pollen spectra via the R-value model , 1983 .

[6]  I. Prentice,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Linear Calibration of Pollen Spectra in Terms of Forest Composition , 1983 .

[7]  I. Prentice Pollen Mapping of Regional Vegetation Patterns in South and Central Sweden , 1983 .

[8]  H. Delcourt,et al.  Mapping and calibration of modern pollen-vegetation relationships in the southeastern United States , 1983 .

[9]  R. Bradshaw,et al.  The pollen—Tree relationship within forests of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, U.S.A. , 1982 .

[10]  T. Webb,,et al.  Estimating plant abundances from pollen percentages: The use of regression analysis , 1981 .

[11]  I. Prentice,et al.  Statistical approaches to R-values and the pollen— vegetation relationship , 1981 .

[12]  T. Webb,,et al.  Sensing Vegetational Patterns with Pollen Data: Choosing the Data , 1978 .

[13]  T. Webb,,et al.  Corresponding Patterns of Contemporary Pollen and Vegetation in Central North America , 1976 .

[14]  H. Hyvärinen Absolute and relative pollen diagrams from northernmost Fennoscandia , 1975 .

[15]  T. Webb, Corresponding Patterns of Pollen and Vegetation in Lower Michigan: A Comparison of Quantitative Data , 1974 .

[16]  F. K. Hare,et al.  Late-Quaternary Vegetation and Climate Near the Arctic Tree Line of Northwestern North America , 1971, Quaternary Research.

[17]  D. Livingstone Some Interstadial and Postglacial Pollen Diagrams from Eastern Canada , 1968 .

[18]  S. Andersen Tree-pollen rain in a mixed deciduous forest in South Jutland (Denmark) , 1967 .

[19]  M. Davis On the theory of pollen analysis , 1963 .