Position Paper: Toward a Medical-concept Representation Language

The Canon Group is an informal organization of medical informatics researchers who are working on the problem of developing a “deeper” representation formalism for use in exchanging data and developing applications. Individuals in the group represent experts in such areas as knowledge representation and computational linguistics, as well as in a variety of medical subdisciplines. All share the view that current mechanisms for the characterization of medical phenomena are either inadequate (limited or rigid) or idiosyncratic (useful for a specific application but incapable of being generalized or extended). The Group proposes to focus on the design of a general schema for medical-language representation including the specification of the resources and associated procedures required to map language (including standard terminologies) into representations that make all implicit relations “visible,” reveal “hidden attributes,” and generally resolve ambiguous or vague references. The Group is proceeding by examining large numbers of texts (records) in medical sub-domains to identify candidate “concepts” and by attempting to develop general rules and representations for elements such as attributes and values so that all concepts may be expressed uniformly.

[1]  Robert M. MacGregor,et al.  The Evolving Technology of Classification-Based Knowledge Representation Systems , 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks.

[2]  David A. Evans,et al.  Managing coherence and context in medical problem-solving discourse. , 1989 .

[3]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Designing an Introspective, Multipurpose, Controlled Medical Vocabulary. , 1989 .

[4]  Elliott Mendelson,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Logic , 1979 .

[5]  Carol Friedman,et al.  A schema for representing medical language applied to clinical radiology. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  Representing Medical Knowledge in a Terminological Language is Difficult , 1988 .

[7]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Unifying Medical Information Using an Architecture Based on Descriptions. , 1990 .

[8]  Marsden S. Blois,et al.  Information and Medicine: The Nature of Medical Descriptions , 1984, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  The Tractability of Subsumption in Frame-Based Description Languages , 1984, AAAI.

[10]  L. McMahon,et al.  Can Medicare prospective payment survive the ICD-9-CM disease classification system? , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  Allen C. Browne,et al.  UMLS knowledge for biomedical language processing. , 1993, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[12]  J. Chisholm,et al.  The Read clinical classification. , 1990, BMJ.

[13]  Carol Friedman,et al.  Research Paper: A General Natural-language Text Processor for Clinical Radiology , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Nicholas V. Findler,et al.  Associative Networks- Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers , 1980, CL.

[15]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  KRYPTON: Integrating Terminology and Assertion , 1983, AAAI.

[16]  M. E. Maron,et al.  An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system , 1985, CACM.

[17]  H. Warner,et al.  An interlingua for electronic interchange of medical information: using frames to map between clinical vocabularies. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  David A. Evans,et al.  Final report on the MedSORT-II project : developing and managing medical thesauri , 1987 .

[19]  Alonzo Church,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Logic , 1991 .

[20]  M G Pacak,et al.  Three solutions to problems of categorized medical nomenclatures. , 1984, Methods of information in medicine.