Stakeholder and public participation in river basin management—an introduction

Participation of the public and stakeholders in river basin management is increasingly promoted because it is expected to improve resource management and enable participants to engage freely and equally in management (support democratic processes). Three overlapping and interacting mechanisms by which participation is expected to enhance river basin management are outlined: (1) providing space for deliberation and consensus building for better quality decisions, (2) mobilizing and developing human and social capital for better quality decisions and their implementation, and (3) raising the legitimacy of decisions to facilitate their implementation. There are several complexities associated with each of the mechanisms that add challenges to realizing the expectations of participation. They include the need to carefully manage consensus building and conflict to maximize the quality of the decision without jeopardizing the potential for implementation; being aware of and implementing strategies to manage asymmetrical power relationships between participants; ensuring that participants perceive benefits from participation that exceed costs; and defining criteria for a legitimate process, and a legitimate decision, that satisfy all participants. Strategies identified to address these challenges focus on managing the characteristics of the participation process. Ongoing evaluation during a participation program or project is essential to reflect and refine how participation is being done, to address the challenges and endeavor to achieve high‐quality decisions that can be implemented efficiently. WIREs Water 2015, 2:393–405. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1086 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

[1]  M. Pelling,et al.  Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? , 2005 .

[2]  M. McClaran,et al.  Theory in Practice: Applying Participatory Democracy Theory to Public Land Planning , 1997, Environmental management.

[3]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[4]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  On the appropriateness of public participation in Integrated Water Resources Management: some grounded insights from the Levant , 2008 .

[5]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Resolving Conflict and Building Cooperation in the National Estuary Program , 2004, Environmental management.

[6]  Markus Schweizer,et al.  Communication And The Evolution Of Society , 2016 .

[7]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[8]  D. Huitema,et al.  Is the jury still out? toward greater insight in policy learning in participatory decision processes-the case of dutch citizens' juries on water management in the rhine basin , 2010 .

[9]  A. Curtis,et al.  Maintaining Volunteer Commitment to Local Watershed Initiatives , 2002, Environmental management.

[10]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Evaluating participation in water resource management: A review , 2012 .

[12]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[13]  M. Lamers,et al.  Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .

[14]  W. Leach Theories about Consensus‐Based Conservation , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  B. Hedelin Criteria for the Assessment of Sustainable Water Management , 2007, Environmental management.

[16]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  Judith Tsouvalis,et al.  Building 'participation' upon critique: The Loweswater Care Project, Cumbria, UK , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[19]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[20]  Judith Petts,et al.  Managing Public Engagement to Optimize Learning: Reflections from Urban River Restoration , 2006 .

[21]  Thomas C. Beierle,et al.  The Quality of Stakeholder‐Based Decisions , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  P. Gleick The changing water paradigm. A look at twenty-first century water resources development. , 2000 .

[23]  M. Leach,et al.  Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community-Based Natural Resource Management , 1999 .

[24]  E. Lichtenstein Social learning. , 1977, NIDA research monograph.

[25]  L. Susskind,et al.  The consensus building handbook : a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement , 1999 .

[26]  Jeffrey Sayer,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Navigating Trade-offs: Working for Conservation and Development Outcomes Navigating Trade-Offs: Working for Conservation and Development Outcomes , 2010 .

[27]  J. Newig,et al.  More input - better output: does citizen involvement improve environmental governance? , 2009 .

[28]  Craig W. Thomas,et al.  What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management , 2006 .

[29]  Allen C. Amason Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[30]  S. Hove Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study , 2000 .

[31]  R. Bjerregaard Getting Europe's waters cleaner: getting the citizens involved , 1998 .

[32]  D. Loucks,et al.  An Analysis of Public Participation in the Lake Ontario—St: Lawrence River Study , 2013 .

[33]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics , 2004 .

[34]  Lisa Norton,et al.  The role of 'Big Society' in monitoring the state of the natural environment. , 2011, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[35]  Cary Coglianese,et al.  The Limits of Consensus: The Environmental Protection System in Transition: Toward a More Desirable Future , 1999 .

[36]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberative and Participatory Approaches in Environmental Geography , 2009 .

[37]  CAS-No Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive and its , 2003 .

[38]  R. Putnam Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[39]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[40]  Ronald E. Doel,et al.  :The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2008 .

[41]  A. Mukherji,et al.  The imposition of participation?: the case of participatory water management in coastal Bangladesh , 2014 .

[42]  K. Ingold,et al.  Water Resources Management: What Should Be Integrated? , 2012, Science.

[43]  N. Uphoff Understanding social capital: learning from the analysis and experience of participation , 2005 .

[44]  It Istituto Superiore di Sanit,et al.  Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document on euthrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. (Technical report 2009-030; Guidance document 23) , 2009 .

[45]  N. Jones Environmental activation of citizens in the context of policy agenda formation and the influence of social capital , 2010 .

[46]  Federal Water Pollution Control Act , 1971 .

[47]  Archon Fung Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance , 2006 .

[48]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches , 2006 .

[49]  M. Hemmati Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict , 2002 .

[50]  David M. Freeman,et al.  WICKED WATER PROBLEMS: SOCIOLOGY AND LOCAL WATER ORGANIZATIONS IN ADDRESSING WATER RESOURCES POLICY 1 , 2000 .

[51]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[52]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[53]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[54]  Laurence Smith,et al.  The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[55]  Dennis Owen United Nations: World Summit on sustainable development — Johannesburg South Africa 26 August to 24 September 2002 [Report A/Conf 199/20 (as re-issued)] , 2004 .

[56]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management , 2008 .

[57]  K. Sexton,et al.  Stakeholder Participation in Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL Case Studies , 2005 .

[58]  Food Security Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , 2004 .

[59]  S. Lane Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world , 2013 .

[60]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation , 2001 .

[61]  J. Newig,et al.  Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? , 2009 .

[62]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[63]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[64]  P. Gleick WATER IN CRISIS: PATHS TO SUSTAINABLE WATER USE , 1998 .

[65]  Luc Hens,et al.  The World Summit on Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[66]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process from People in the Field , 2001 .

[67]  K. Halvorsen Critical Next Steps in Research on Public Meetings and Environmental Decision Making , 2006 .

[68]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure , 1993, Policy Sciences.

[69]  C. Blackmore,et al.  A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies , 2007 .

[70]  P. Stern,et al.  Participation by Local Governmental Officials in Watershed Management Planning , 2003 .

[71]  Kerry A. Waylen,et al.  Hybridity of Representation: Insights from River Basin Management Planning in Scotland , 2014 .

[72]  Victoria J. Michener The participatory approach: Contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso , 1998 .

[73]  A. Bahri Water Woes , 2008, Nature.

[74]  M. Callon The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge , 1999 .

[75]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[76]  T. Webler,et al.  What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public , 2001, Environmental management.

[77]  P. Blaikie,et al.  Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana by , 2003 .

[78]  Patrick Steyaert,et al.  The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands , 2007 .

[79]  Thomas C. Beierle Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals , 1998 .

[80]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes , 2008 .

[81]  John Briggs,et al.  Indigenous knowledges and development: a postcolonial caution , 2004 .

[82]  Alexander Conley,et al.  Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement , 2003 .

[83]  Thomas Webler,et al.  The craft and theory of public participation: a dialectical process , 1999 .

[84]  Coping with change: responses of the Uzbek water management regime to socio-economic transition and global change , 2010 .

[85]  C. Folke,et al.  Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden , 2006 .

[86]  Jean Hillier,et al.  `Agon'izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real' , 2003 .