Ventilation rate in office buildings and sick building syndrome.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the relation between ventilation rate and occurrence of symptoms of the eyes, nose, throat, and skin as well as general symptoms such as lethargy and headache, often termed the sick building syndrome. METHODS--A cross sectional population based study was carried out in 399 workers from 14 mechanically ventilated office buildings without air recirculation or humidification, selected randomly from the Helsinki metropolitan area. The ventilation type and other characteristics of these buildings were recorded on a site visit and the ventilation in the rooms was assessed by measuring the airflow through the exhaust air outlets in the room. A questionnaire directed at workers inquired about the symptoms and perceived air quality and their possible personal and environmental determinants (response rate 81%). The outcomes were weekly work related symptoms experienced during the previous 12 months and symptom groups defined either by their anatomical location or hypothesised mechanism. RESULTS--In logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for any symptom of interest was 3.03 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13 to 8.10) in the very low ventilation category of below 5 l/s per person and 2.24 (0.89 to 5.65) in the high ventilation category of over 25 l/s per person compared with the reference (15- < 25 l/s). The ORs for ocular (1.27, 1.11 to 1.46), nasal (1.17, 1.06 to 1.29), skin symptoms (1.18, 1.05 to 1.32), and lethargy (1.09, 1.00 to 1.19) increased significantly by a unit decrease in ventilation from 25 to 0 l/s per person. CONCLUSION--The results suggest that outdoor air ventilation rates below the optimal (15 to 25 l/s per person) increase the risk of the symptoms of sick building syndrome with the sources of pollutants present in mechanically ventilated office buildings. The Finnish guideline value is 10 l/s per person.

[1]  Dan Norbäck,et al.  The prevalence of symptoms associated with sick buildings and polluted industrial environments as compared to unexposed reference groups without expressed dissatisfaction , 1989 .

[2]  O Seppänen,et al.  Air recirculation and sick building syndrome: a blinded crossover trial. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[3]  P. Skov,et al.  Influence of indoor climate on the sick building syndrome in an office environment. The Danish Indoor Climate Study Group. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine , 1986 .

[5]  A. Smith,et al.  Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[6]  C A Pickering,et al.  The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. , 1984, British medical journal.

[7]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: The Danish town hall study , 1987 .

[8]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Associations between type of ventilation and air flow rates in office buildings and the risk of SBS-symptoms among occupants , 1994 .

[9]  Alan Hedge,et al.  Work-related illness in offices: A proposed model of the ‘sick building syndrome’ , 1991 .

[10]  David Peter Wyon,et al.  Sick buildings and the experimental approach , 1992 .

[11]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  Mechanical Ventilation in Office Buildings and the Sick Building Syndrome. An Experimental and Epidemiological Study , 1991 .

[12]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Non‐Specific Symptoms In Office Workers: A Review And Summary Of The Epidemiologic Literature , 1993 .

[13]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Phase 1 of the California Healthy Building Study: A Summary , 1993 .

[14]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  A Hedge,et al.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. , 1987, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  Jan Sundell,et al.  A Prevalence Study Of The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) And Facial Skin Symptoms In Office Workers , 1993 .

[17]  R Menzies,et al.  The effect of varying levels of outdoor-air supply on the symptoms of sick building syndrome. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J J Jaakkola,et al.  Type of ventilation system in office buildings and sick building syndrome. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Birgitta Berglund,et al.  Sensory reactions to “sick buildings” , 1986 .

[20]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Health and Indoor Climate Complaints of 7043 office Workers in 61 Buildings in the Netherlands , 1992 .