Geometrical Transformations Of Density Images

With proper calibration several image acquisition modalities produce images whose intensity is proportional to the density of some conserved quantity or to the projection of such a density. Such "density" images may be obtained for example in computer assisted tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); projected density images may be obtained via radiography or scintigraphy. Within a given imaging modality, density images of a given set of objects are related through one-to-one geometrical transformations. Differences among the images may arise from object motion between acquisitions or from changes in the acquisition device itself. In this paper techniques are presented for finding approximate geometrical transformations between density images of a set of objects acquired via the same modality. Applications are discussed with respect to motion artifacts that obscure artery images in digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and field inhomogeniety artifacts in MRI. Experimental results in DSA are presented to demonstrate that the principle difficulty lies not in finding an effective transformation for removing motion artifacts, but in selecting one that distinguishes between the artifacts and the artery.

[1]  Alain Venot,et al.  Automated Correction of Patient Motion and Gray Values Prior to Subtraction in Digitized Angiography , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  P. Bendel Echo Projection Imaging-A Method to Obtain NMR Images Undistorted by Magnetic Field Inhomogeneities , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J C Roucayrol,et al.  An automated system for the registration and comparison of photographic images in medicine. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[4]  James Serrin,et al.  Mathematical Principles of Classical Fluid Mechanics , 1959 .

[5]  G. Timberlake,et al.  Feature-Based Registration of Retinal Images , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Registration And Reversible Compression Of Angiographic Image Sequences , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  The existence of geometrical density-image transformations corresponding to object motion , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  John Fitzpatrick,et al.  A class of one-to-one two-dimensional transformations , 1987 .

[9]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[10]  Tak Sum Wong,et al.  Spin-Inversion Imaging: A Technique for NMR Imaging under Magnetic Fields with High Field Nonuniformities , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Technique For Automatic Motion Correction In Digital Subtraction Angiography , 1987 .

[13]  Hsuan Chang,et al.  Displaytool: An Image Display Utility For Sun Workstations , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Experimental Results Of Image Registration In Digital Subtraction Angiography With An In Vivo Phantom , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[15]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  The Reduction Of Motion Artifacts In Digital Subtraction Angiography By Geometrical Image Transformation , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Takao Akatsuka,et al.  REGISTRATION OF LOCALLY DISTORTED IMAGES BY MULTIWINDOW PATTERN MATCHING AND DISPLACEMENT INTERPOLATION: THE PROPOSAL OF AN ALGORITHM AND ITS APPLICATION TO DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY. , 1984 .

[17]  J. M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Simulated annealing for motion correction in digital subtraction angiography , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.