Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines VI: Evaluation of methods for comparison of amphetamine.

Amphetamine samples were analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and the peak areas of 33 target compounds were transformed by applying various pretreatment techniques. The objective was to optimise the ability of a number of distance metrics to establish links between samples of amphetamine originating from the same batch (henceforth referred to as linked distances). Furthermore, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to evaluate the effects of various pretreatment methods on separation of amphetamine batches synthesised by the Leuckart reaction, reductive amination of benzyl methyl ketone, and the nitrostyrene route. The most efficient way to pretreat GC-MS data varied for the different distance metrics, although best results were obtained when data were normalised to the sum of peak areas, and either the fourth root or a logarithm was applied to the normalised data. When pretreating normalised data by fourth root transformation, Pearson correlation was the distance metric that was most successful at finding linked samples. Normalisation and the use of fourth root also represented the best method of pretreating data when employing PLS-DA to separate samples synthesised by different routes. To achieve a faster and more user-friendly procedure for evaluating chromatograms, experiments were performed in which the number of target compounds used to compare samples was reduced. The effect of each compound that was removed was studied by applying PLS-DA and by using Pearson correlation to calculate linked distances as well as unlinked distances (between samples from different batches of amphetamine). Considering both links between samples from the same batch and separation of samples synthesised by different routes, the best results were obtained with the data set comprising 26 compounds. Finally, it was found that the profiling method developed in this work was superior to an existing technique with respect to separating linked and unlinked distances.

[1]  L. Strömberg.  Comparative gas chromatographic analysis of narcotics. II. Amphetamine sulphate. , 1975, Journal of chromatography.

[2]  L. King,et al.  Amphetamine profiling in the UK , 1994 .

[3]  M. Lambrechts,et al.  Leuckart-specific impurities in amphetamine and methamphetamine seized in Norway. , 1984, Bulletin on narcotics.

[4]  Andrzej Parczewski,et al.  Application of chemometric methods in searching for illicit Leuckart amphetamine sources , 2001 .

[5]  Laura Aalberg,et al.  Development of a harmonized method for the profiling of amphetamines. II. Stability of impurities in organic solvents. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[6]  Xiwu Lin,et al.  Megavariate data analysis of mass spectrometric proteomics data using latent variable projection method , 2003, Proteomics.

[7]  C.S.L. Jonson,et al.  Amphetamine profiling — improvements of data processing , 1994 .

[8]  C S Jonson,et al.  Computer aided retrieval of common-batch members in Leuckart amphetamine profiling. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  F Taroni,et al.  A methodology for illicit heroin seizures comparison in a drug intelligence perspective using large databases. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[10]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 1987, Comprehensive Chemometrics.

[11]  Laura Aalberg,et al.  Development of a harmonized method for the profiling of amphetamines. I. Synthesis of standards and compilation of analytical data. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[12]  J F Casale,et al.  A computerized neural network method for pattern recognition of cocaine signatures. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  L. Strömberg,et al.  Two-level classification of Leuckart amphetamine , 1994 .

[14]  Laura Aalberg,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines V: Determination of the variability of the optimised method. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[15]  James R. Pearson,et al.  Impurity profiling of methylamphetamine in Australia and the development of a national drugs database , 1994 .

[16]  Fabrice Besacier,et al.  A contribution to the chemical profiling of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) tablets. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[17]  M D Cole,et al.  Development of a predictive model for batch membership of street samples of heroin. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[18]  S. Klemenc,et al.  In common batch searching of illicit heroin samples--evaluation of data by chemometrics methods. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[19]  Michael D Cole,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines: III. Development of the gas chromatographic method. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[20]  Michael D Cole,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines: IV. Optimisation of sample preparation. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[21]  K. Himberg,et al.  Automated gas chromatographic amphetamine profiling , 1994 .