Interactive Allocation of Water Pollutant Initial Emission Rights in a Basin under Total Amount Control: A Leader-Follower Hierarchical Decision Model

The initial emission rights allocation is the key measure to achieve the goal of total amount control and deepen the emission trading system. Although many studies have focused on the modeling of initial emission rights allocation, such as using game theory and multi-objective optimization methods, few studies have observed the hierarchical relationship of mutual interference and restriction between watershed management agency and local governments in each subarea during allocation. This relationship directly affects the rationality of the results of regional emission rights allocation. In this study, a leader-follower hierarchical decision model (LFHDM) for allocating initial emission rights in a basin is developed. Based on the bilevel programming approach, the model simulates the interactive decision-making process between the watershed management agency of the upper-level model (LFHDM-U) and the local government of the lower-level model (LFHDM-L) in the allocation under total amount control. A case study of China’s Yellow River Basin is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the model. Findings reveal that, compared with the single-level model, the developed LFHDM has higher satisfaction with the allocation scheme. Under different scenarios, the overall satisfaction of the configuration schemes of COD and NH3-N in each province and autonomous region remains above 0.9. In addition, the allocation volumes of COD and NH3-N in each province of the Yellow River Basin in planning year increase with the enhancement of allowable assimilative capacity of water bodies, but the interval gap of satisfaction with allocation schemes gradually narrows. It shows that when the allowable assimilation capacity of a water body is low, the decision-making of the allocation scheme needs to be more cautious. Moreover, for the Yellow River Basin, apart from Qinghai and Sichuan, the task of reducing water pollutants in other provinces in the next few years is very arduous. The average reduction of total COD and NH3-N in the basin is about 48% and 46%, respectively.

[1]  Jin Huang,et al.  Spatiotemporal change of ecologic environment quality and human interaction factors in three gorges ecologic economic corridor, based on RSEI , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[2]  M. Mazaheri,et al.  Cost-based model for optimal waste-load allocation and pollution loading losses in river system: simulation–optimization approach , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[3]  S. Lai,et al.  Water quality assessment and pollution threat to safe water supply for three river basins in Malaysia. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Liming Yao,et al.  Optimal allocation and transaction of waste load permits for transboundary basin: A Bi-level programming approach based on node-arc. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Qiwei Xie,et al.  Water pollutant discharge permit allocation based on DEA and non-cooperative game theory. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Hubiao Zhang,et al.  Interval TOPSIS with a novel interval number comprehensive weight for threat evaluation on uncertain information , 2021, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  The Water Quality Improvement through Two Pollutant Load Allocation Methods in Gehu Lake, China , 2021, Journal of Environmental Engineering.

[8]  A. Afshar,et al.  An adaptive metamodelling for multipollutant waste load allocation in a river–reservoir system; hydrodynamic simulation–optimization , 2021, Water and Environment Journal.

[9]  Li-na Zhang,et al.  Technical inefficiency, abatement cost and substitutability of industrial water pollutants in Jiangsu Province, China , 2021 .

[10]  Liming Yao,et al.  Trade-off between equity and efficiency for allocating wastewater emission permits in watersheds considering transaction. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Mian Yang,et al.  Assessment and optimization of provincial CO2 emission reduction scheme in China: An improved ZSG-DEA approach , 2020 .

[12]  Motahareh Saadatpour,et al.  Equilibrium strategy based waste load allocation using simulated annealing optimization algorithm , 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[13]  Paolo Piselli,et al.  Effects of European emission unit allowance auctions on corporate profitability , 2020 .

[14]  Aiqing Kang,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Water Resources Considering Water Quality and the Absorbing Pollution Capacity of Water , 2020, Water Resources.

[15]  Huanzhen Zhang,et al.  Allocating total emission pollutant control based on water environmental carrying capacity: model establishment and case study , 2019, Water Policy.

[16]  J. Bi,et al.  How to allocate discharge permits more fairly in China?-A new perspective from watershed and regional allocation comparison on socio-natural equality. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Xinyang Deng,et al.  Fault diagnosis based on TOPSIS method with Manhattan distance , 2019, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[18]  Zahid Raza,et al.  Auction Based Resource Provisioning in Cloud Computing , 2018, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.

[19]  W. Xiaoyan,et al.  A method for water pollution load allocation for different levels of pollution discharges , 2018 .

[20]  Yi Liu,et al.  Towards greater socio-economic equality in allocation of wastewater discharge permits in China based on the weighted Gini coefficient , 2017 .

[21]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Integrated waste load allocation for river water pollution control under uncertainty: a case study of Tuojiang River, China , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Jing Li,et al.  A leader-follower-interactive method for regional water resources management with considering multiple water demands and eco-environmental constraints , 2017 .

[23]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Cost-based modelling of optimal emission quota allocation , 2017 .

[24]  Hongwei Lu,et al.  Bi-Level Decision-Making Approach for GHG Emissions Control and Municipal Solid Waste Management under Parameter Uncertainty: A Case Study in Beijing, China , 2016 .

[25]  Mohammad Reza Nikoo,et al.  Optimizing Multiple-Pollutant Waste Load Allocation in Rivers: An Interval Parameter Game Theoretic Model , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[26]  Yong-Gun Kim,et al.  An Emission Trading Scheme Design for Power Industries Facing Price Regulation , 2014 .

[27]  C. Knight Moderate Emissions Grandfathering , 2014 .

[28]  Binbin Huang,et al.  Optimal allocation model of river emission rights based on water environment capacity limits , 2014 .

[29]  Zhuo Yao,et al.  Use of a minimum environmental Gini Coefficient model on optimizing the allocation plan of total pollutant load in water bodies: a case study at Zhangjiagang river-network plain. , 2014 .

[30]  Yunzhong Jiang,et al.  Optimal allocation of water quantity and waste load in the Northwest Pearl River Delta, China , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[31]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[32]  Song Bing-bing Total Water Pollutant Load Allocation in Dongting Lake Area based on the Environmental Gini Coefficient Method , 2013 .

[33]  Uwe Schneider,et al.  Issues to consider in the derivation of water quality benchmarks for the protection of aquatic life , 2013, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[34]  Mohammad Reza Nikoo,et al.  Water and Pollution Discharge Permit Allocation to Agricultural Zones: Application of Game Theory and Min-Max Regret Analysis , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[35]  J. Bi,et al.  Equity-based optimisation of regional water pollutant discharge amount allocation: a case study in the Tai Lake Basin , 2012 .

[36]  Qiu Lei CONSTRUCTION OF A COOPERATION ALLOCATING INITIAL DISCHARGE PERMITS SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL SOURCE POINTS IN A LAKE BASIN ——A CASE STUDY OF THE TAIHU LAKE BASIN , 2012 .

[37]  Reza Kerachian,et al.  River water quality management under incomplete information: application of an N-person iterated signaling game , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[38]  C. Krishnamurti,et al.  Efficiency of European emissions markets: Lessons and implications , 2011 .

[39]  Yu Lin-jie An Allocation Model of Free Permits for Initial Discharge in a River Basin based on Cost-effectiveness , 2011 .

[40]  Shu Kun,et al.  Allocation method of water waste loads based on Vague sets , 2011 .

[41]  Huang Xian-jin,et al.  Models for Initial Allocation of Emission Permits in a River Basin During Industrial Development: A Case Study of Huaihe River Basin, China , 2010 .

[42]  Binghui Zheng,et al.  Study on the total water pollutant load allocation in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Estuary and adjacent seawater area , 2010 .

[43]  Wang Yin-tang,et al.  Initial two-dimensional water right allocation modeling based on water quantity and water quality in the rive basin , 2010 .

[44]  Yang Mu-zhuang Research on the Ecological Compensation Standard , 2009 .

[45]  Liu Guan-fei,et al.  Application of information entropy to regional allocation of waste water load , 2009 .

[46]  Chu Jun-ying Model for distribution of water pollutants in a lake basin based on environmental Gini coefficient , 2009 .

[47]  Seungbong Han,et al.  Landscape Planning for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction III: Assessing Phosphorus and Sediment Reduction Potential , 2009, Environmental management.

[48]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[49]  S. Murty Bhallamudi,et al.  Multiobjective Optimal Waste Load Allocation Models for Rivers Using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II , 2006 .

[50]  Manoj K. Jha,et al.  The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction Across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients As an Implementation Tool , 2006 .

[51]  WU Yu-hua,et al.  Evaluation on the Decision Making Units in Interval DEA , 2004 .

[52]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  Peter Cramton,et al.  Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather , 2002 .

[54]  M. Dong,et al.  Water quality modeling in the watershed-based approach for waste load allocations , 1998 .

[55]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting , 1998 .

[56]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[57]  J. Dales Pollution, property and prices;: An essay in policy-making and economics , 1970 .