Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions.

BACKGROUND The monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, combined with chemotherapeutic agents, has been shown to prolong overall survival in physically fit patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but not in those with coexisting conditions. We investigated the benefit of the type 2, glycoengineered antibody obinutuzumab (also known as GA101) as compared with that of rituximab, each combined with chlorambucil, in patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions. METHODS We randomly assigned 781 patients with previously untreated CLL and a score higher than 6 on the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) (range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating worse health status) or an estimated creatinine clearance of 30 to 69 ml per minute to receive chlorambucil, obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil, or rituximab plus chlorambucil. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS The patients had a median age of 73 years, creatinine clearance of 62 ml per minute, and CIRS score of 8 at baseline. Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil or rituximab-chlorambucil, as compared with chlorambucil monotherapy, increased response rates and prolonged progression-free survival (median progression-free survival, 26.7 months with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil vs. 11.1 months with chlorambucil alone; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.24; P<0.001; and 16.3 months with rituximab-chlorambucil vs. 11.1 months with chlorambucil alone; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.57; P<0.001). Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil, as compared with chlorambucil alone, prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74; P=0.002). Treatment with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil, as compared with rituximab-chlorambucil, resulted in prolongation of progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.49; P<0.001) and higher rates of complete response (20.7% vs. 7.0%) and molecular response. Infusion-related reactions and neutropenia were more common with obinutuzumab-chlorambucil than with rituximab-chlorambucil, but the risk of infection was not increased. CONCLUSIONS Combining an anti-CD20 antibody with chemotherapy improved outcomes in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. In this patient population, obinutuzumab was superior to rituximab when each was combined with chlorambucil. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01010061.).

[1]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Rituximab dose-escalation trial in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  C. Klein,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro effects of the anti‐CD20 antibodies rituximab and GA101 on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[3]  J. Gribben,et al.  Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil In Patients with CD20-Positive B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Final Response Analysis of An Open-Label Phase II Study , 2010 .

[4]  R. Foà,et al.  Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil As Initial Treatment for Elderly Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Effect of Pre-Treatment Biological Characteristics and Gene Expression Patterns on Response to Treatment , 2011 .

[5]  C. Klein,et al.  Preclinical Activity of the Type II CD20 Antibody GA101 (Obinutuzumab) Compared with Rituximab and Ofatumumab In Vitro and in Xenograft Models , 2013, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[6]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[7]  L. Tremmel,et al.  Phase III randomized study of bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  H. Döhner,et al.  Standardized MRD flow and ASO IGH RQ-PCR for MRD quantification in CLL patients after rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy: a comparative analysis , 2009, Leukemia.

[9]  G. Brittinger,et al.  First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[10]  M. Gordon Phase III Trial of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide Compared With Fludarabine for Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: US Intergroup Trial E2997 , 2008 .

[11]  F. Salvi,et al.  A Manual of Guidelines to Score the Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale and Its Validation in Acute Hospitalized Elderly Patients , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  N. Chiorazzi,et al.  mechanisms of disease Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 2010 .

[13]  T. Robak,et al.  Emerging monoclonal antibodies and related agents for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2013, Future oncology.

[14]  U. Jaeger,et al.  Chemoimmunotherapy with GA101 plus chlorambucil in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and comorbidity: results of the CLL11 (BO21004) safety run-in , 2013, Leukemia.

[15]  T. Illidge,et al.  Novel type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (GA101) evokes homotypic adhesion and actin-dependent, lysosome-mediated cell death in B-cell malignancies. , 2011, Blood.

[16]  N. Schmitz,et al.  Quantitative MRD monitoring identifies distinct GVL response patterns after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the GCLLSG CLL3X trial , 2008, Leukemia.

[17]  ONSTANZE,et al.  GENOMIC ABERRATIONS AND SURVIVAL IN CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA , 2010 .

[18]  P. Loehrer Assessment of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (the LRF CLL4 Trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2008 .

[19]  G. Marti,et al.  CD20 and CD5 Expression in B‐Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Byrd,et al.  Impact of age on outcomes after initial therapy with chemotherapy and different chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of sequential cancer and leukemia group B studies. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  C. Klein,et al.  Preclinical Studies on the Mechanism of Action and the Anti-Lymphoma Activity of the Novel Anti-CD20 Antibody GA101 , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[22]  M P Lawton,et al.  Validation of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in a Geriatric Residential Population , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  K. Do,et al.  Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2008, Blood.

[24]  G. Salles,et al.  Phase I Study of RO5072759 (GA101) in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. , 2009 .

[25]  Axel Benner,et al.  Stromal-derived factor 1 inhibits the cycling of very primitive human hematopoietic cells in vitro and in NOD/SCID mice. , 2002, Blood.

[26]  Hervé Watier,et al.  From the bench to the bedside: ways to improve rituximab efficacy. , 2004, Blood.

[27]  T. Robak,et al.  Alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  H. Döhner,et al.  Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multivariate analysis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  G. Brittinger,et al.  Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine alone in first-line therapy of younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2005, Blood.

[30]  Michael Hallek,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. , 2008, Blood.

[31]  R. Foà,et al.  Dasatinib as first-line treatment for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2011, Blood.

[32]  Cockcroft Dw,et al.  Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine , 1976 .

[33]  G. Jenkins,et al.  Comorbid conditions and survival in unselected, newly diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2008, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[34]  J. Byrd,et al.  International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia , 2007, Leukemia.

[35]  B. Cheson,et al.  Fludarabine compared with chlorambucil as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  J. Byrd,et al.  Addition of rituximab to fludarabine may prolong progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an updated retrospective comparative analysis of CALGB 9712 and CALGB 9011. , 2005, Blood.

[37]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  FCR-3 as Frontline Therapy for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). , 2005 .

[38]  C. Klein,et al.  Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. , 2010, Blood.

[39]  C. Owen,et al.  Obinutuzumab for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders , 2012, Expert opinion on biological therapy.