High-throughput microplate enzymatic assays for fast sugar and acid quantification in apple and tomato.

In this article, we report on the use of miniaturized and automated enzymatic assays as an alternative technology for fast sugar and acid quantification in apples and tomatoes. Enzymatic assays for d-glucose, d-fructose, sucrose, D-sorbitol/xylitol, L-malic acid, citric acid, succinic acid, and L-glutamic acid were miniaturized from the standard 3 mL assays in cuvettes into assays of 200 microL or lower in 96 or 384 well microplates. The miniaturization and the automation were achieved with a four channel automatic liquid handling system in order to reduce the dispensing errors and to obtain an increased sample throughput. Performance factors (limit of detection, linearity of calibration curve, and repeatability) of the assays with standard solutions were proven to be satisfactory. The automated and miniaturized assays were validated with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses for the quantification of sugars and acids in tomato and apple extracts. The high correlation between the two techniques for the different components indicates that the high-throughput microplate enzymatic assays can serve as a fast, reliable, and inexpensive alternative for HPLC as the standard analysis technique in the taste characterization of fruit and vegetables. In addition to the analysis of extracts, the high-throughput microplate enzymatic assays were used for the direct analysis of centrifuged and filtered tomato juice with an additional advantage that the sample preparation time and analysis costs are reduced significantly.

[1]  C. Natale,et al.  An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life , 2004 .

[2]  B. Nicolai,et al.  The electronic tongue and ATR–FTIR for rapid detection of sugars and acids in tomatoes , 2006 .

[3]  F. Escher,et al.  Importance and consumer perception of freshness of apples , 2006 .

[4]  C. Natale,et al.  Mapping consumer liking of tomatoes with fast aroma profiling techniques , 2005 .

[5]  David C Cullen,et al.  Development of a common biosensor format for an enzyme based biosensor array to monitor fruit quality. , 2003, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  Anette Kistrup Thybo,et al.  The influence of sensory and physiochemical quality on Danish children's preferences for apples , 2001 .

[7]  Leon A Terry,et al.  The application of biosensors to fresh produce and the wider food industry. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[8]  Paula B. Andrade,et al.  Study of the organic acids composition of quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) fruit and jam. , 2002 .

[9]  F. Vos,et al.  A rapid and inexpensive microplate assay for the enzymatic determination of glucose, fructose, sucrose, L-malate and citrate in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) extracts and in orange juice. , 2001, Phytochemical analysis : PCA.

[10]  N. Kim,et al.  Determination of glucose, ascorbic and citric acids by two-ISFET multienzyme sensor , 1998 .

[11]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Applications of electronic noses and tongues in food analysis , 2004 .

[12]  John R. U. Wilson,et al.  Cost‐effective colorimetric microtitre plate enzymatic assays for sucrose, glucose and fructose in sugarcane tissue extracts , 1999 .

[13]  Robert L. Shewfelt,et al.  Flavor quality of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels , 1995 .

[14]  G. Echeverría,et al.  Multivariate analysis of modifications in biosynthesis of volatile compounds after CA storage of 'Fuji' apples , 2006 .

[15]  Miltiades I. Karayannis,et al.  Enzyme Based Amperometric Biosensors for Food Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  Daniel Valero,et al.  Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by Aloe vera treatment: A new edible coating , 2006 .

[17]  J. D. Winefordner,et al.  Limit of detection. A closer look at the IUPAC definition , 1983 .

[18]  Ivonne Delgadillo,et al.  Application of FTIR spectroscopy for the quantification of sugars in mango juice as a function of ripening. , 2002, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[19]  S. Drake,et al.  The partial compositional characteristics of apple juice from 175 apple varieties , 2005 .

[20]  P H Petersen,et al.  Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with reference method by use of difference plots. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[21]  D. Valero,et al.  Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[22]  B. Nicolai,et al.  Analysis of apples varieties – comparison of electronic tongue with different analytical techniques , 2006 .

[23]  F. Ruiz-Beviá,et al.  Quantitative analysis of flavour volatiles detects differences among closely related traditional cultivars of tomato , 2005 .

[24]  Lauro T. Kubota,et al.  Review of the use of biosensors as analytical tools in the food and drink industries , 2002 .

[25]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[26]  Bart Nicolai,et al.  Effect of natural variability among apples on the accuracy of VIS-NIR calibration models for optimal harvest date predictions , 2005 .

[27]  I. Molnár-Perl,et al.  Optimization of the simultaneous determination of acids and sugars as their trimethylsilyl(oxime) derivatives by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and determination of the composition of six apple varieties , 1994 .

[28]  L M Thienpont,et al.  Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data? , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[29]  S. Nicklaus,et al.  Determination and gustatory properties of taste-active compounds in tomato juice , 2003 .

[30]  A. M. Gil,et al.  Multivariate analysis of NMR and FTIR data as a potential tool for the quality control of beer. , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[31]  F. A. Gunson,et al.  Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: sweet and acid taste of apple fruit , 2002 .

[32]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples , 2003 .

[33]  T. Tsukatani,et al.  Simultaneous quantitation of citrate and isocitrate in citrus juice by a flow-injection method based on the use of enzyme reactors , 1996 .