Targeting alpha-band oscillations in a cortical model with amplitude-modulated high-frequency transcranial electric stimulation

&NA; Non‐invasive brain stimulation to target specific network activity patterns, e.g. transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has become an essential tool to understand the causal role of neuronal oscillations in cognition and behavior. However, conventional sinusoidal tACS limits the ability to record neuronal activity during stimulation and lacks spatial focality. One particularly promising new tACS stimulation paradigm uses amplitude‐modulated (AM) high‐frequency waveforms (AM‐tACS) with a slow signal envelope that may overcome the limitations. Moreover. AM‐tACS using high‐frequency carrier signals is more tolerable than conventional tACS, e.g. in terms of skin irritation and occurrence of phosphenes, when applied at the same current intensities (e.g. 1–2 mA). Yet, the fundamental mechanism of neuronal target‐engagement by AM‐tACS waveforms has remained unknown. We used a computational model of cortex to investigate how AM‐tACS modulates endogenous oscillations and compared the target engagement mechanism to the case of conventional (unmodulated) low‐frequency tACS. Analysis of stimulation amplitude and frequency indicated that cortical oscillations were phase‐locked to the envelope of the AM stimulation signal, which thus exhibits the same target engagement mechanism as conventional (unmodulated) low frequency tACS. However, in the computational model substantially higher current intensities were needed for AM‐tACS than for low‐frequency (unmodulated) tACS waveforms to achieve pronounced phase synchronization. Our analysis of the carrier frequency suggests that there might be a trade‐off between the use of high‐frequency carriers and the stimulation amplitude required for successful entrainment. Together, our computational simulations support the use of slow‐envelope high frequency carrier AM waveforms as a tool for noninvasive modulation of brain oscillations. More empirical data will be needed to identify the optimal stimulation parameters and to evaluate tolerability and safety of both, AM‐ and conventional tACS.

[1]  Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields , 2017, Cell.

[2]  D. Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .

[3]  Romain Brette,et al.  The Brian Simulator , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  Joël M. H. Karel,et al.  Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  J. Deans,et al.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting , 2006 .

[8]  S. Hughes,et al.  Thalamic Mechanisms of EEG Alpha Rhythms and Their Pathological Implications , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[9]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[11]  Lisa Marshall,et al.  Contribution of transcranial oscillatory stimulation to research on neural networks: an emphasis on hippocampo-neocortical rhythms , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Sarah Harrison,et al.  Eyes wide shut. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[13]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Alters Neuronal Input/Output Function , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  W Paulus,et al.  Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  Douglas P. Gross,et al.  Effectiveness of Interferential Current Therapy in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[17]  Adrienne L Fairhall,et al.  Decoding Stimulus Variance from a Distributional Neural Code of Interspike Intervals , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Fiona E. N. LeBeau,et al.  Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Juliann M. Mellin,et al.  Functional role of frontal alpha oscillations in creativity , 2015, Cortex.

[20]  F. D. da Silva,et al.  Organization of thalamic and cortical alpha rhythms: spectra and coherences. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Anders Lansner,et al.  Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  David Poeppel,et al.  Acoustic landmarks drive delta–theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing , 2014, NeuroImage.

[23]  Lucas C Parra,et al.  Lasting modulation of in vitro oscillatory activity with weak direct current stimulation. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Flavio Frohlich,et al.  EEG feedback-controlled transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[25]  Yi Liu,et al.  Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Application , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems (ICAIIS).

[26]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Neuroplasticity induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2008 .

[28]  Flavio Fröhlich,et al.  Endogenous Cortical Oscillations Constrain Neuromodulation by Weak Electric Fields , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[29]  G. Shepherd,et al.  The neocortical circuit: themes and variations , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  André Longtin,et al.  Neural dynamics of envelope coding. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[31]  André Longtin,et al.  Contrast coding in the electrosensory system: parallels with visual computation , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Hillel Adesnik,et al.  Inhibitory Circuits in Cortical Layer 5 , 2016, Front. Neural Circuits.

[33]  D. E. Goldman.  POTENTIAL, IMPEDANCE, AND RECTIFICATION IN MEMBRANES , 1943, The Journal of general physiology.

[34]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[35]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Encoding of Naturalistic Stimuli by Local Field Potential Spectra in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  Observed Brain Dynamics , 2007 .

[37]  Yuzhuo Su,et al.  Spike Timing Amplifies the Effect of Electric Fields on Neurons: Implications for Endogenous Field Effects , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications , 1993 .

[39]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[41]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[42]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[43]  H. Markram,et al.  Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  J. Born,et al.  tACS Phase Locking of Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations Disrupts Working Memory Performance , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[46]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Individual Alpha Activity in Human EEG , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  Laura E. Matzen,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Enhancement of Fluid Intelligence Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2013, Current Biology.

[48]  André Longtin,et al.  The cellular basis for parallel neural transmission of a high-frequency stimulus and its low-frequency envelope , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Flavio Fröhlich,et al.  Endogenous and exogenous electric fields as modifiers of brain activity: rational design of noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2014, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[50]  G C Goats,et al.  Interferential current therapy. , 1990, British journal of sports medicine.

[51]  Tomas Bohr,et al.  Complete Devil's Staircase, Fractal Dimension, and Universality of Mode- Locking Structure in the Circle Map , 1983 .

[52]  W. Klimesch.  EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[53]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[54]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[55]  C. Koch,et al.  Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[58]  M. Murray,et al.  Shaping Intrinsic Neural Oscillations with Periodic Stimulation , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. II. A/lgorithms and applications , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[60]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  The Pulvinar Regulates Information Transmission Between Cortical Areas Based on Attention Demands , 2012, Science.

[62]  Roberta Sellaro,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017 .

[63]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Sustained Aftereffect of α-tACS Lasts Up to 70 min after Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[64]  K. Hawkins.  Visual cortical alpha rhythms : function and relation to other dynamic signatures in local networks , 2016 .

[65]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Eyes wide shut: Transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[66]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Multimodal characterization of population responses evoked by applied electric field in vitro: extracellular potential, magnetic evoked field, transmembrane potential, and current-source density analysis , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[67]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Enhances Mental Rotation Performance during and after Stimulation , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  A. Engel,et al.  EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[69]  Guoshi Li,et al.  Target Engagement with Transcranial Current Stimulation , 2016 .

[70]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Safety of 5 kHz tACS , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[71]  E. Callaway,et al.  Fine-scale specificity of cortical networks depends on inhibitory cell type and connectivity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the low kHz range increases motor cortex excitability. , 2011, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[73]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[74]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.