Models for management of wildlife populations: lessons from spectacled bears in zoos and grizzly bears in Yellowstone

Models of population dynamics are frequently used in the management and conservation of wildlife populations. They provide a powerful method of quantitatively assessing a population’s risk of decline and determining the potential to reverse the decline. Models from recent studies of managed populations are presented. The first model simulates the spectacled bear populations maintained in American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA) zoos. The second model simulates the grizzly bear population in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). The article concludes with a discussion of system dynamics modeling in the larger context of population dynamics modeling. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 20, 163–178, (2004) Quantitative models of population dynamics are essential tools for conservation and management of endangered and threatened species (Beissinger and Westphal 1998; Beissinger and McCullough 2002; Morris and Doak 2002). They are used as general predictive tools for assessing a population’s risk of extinction or potential for growth. With sensitivity, elasticity, and perturbation analyses, users can assess the impact of changes in demographic rates on a population’s growth or decline (Mills and Lindberg 2002). Through such analyses the model can be used to assess the impact of management actions, to indicate which variables are most critical for prioritized data collection, and ultimately to guide allocation of conservation resources. Population models focus on understanding the demographic processes influencing population growth through births, deaths, immigration and emigration. The models show how the demography is influenced by external factors such as environmental fluctuations and by management actions. We work within two systems closely influenced by management actions. In captive populations maintained in AZA institutions, for example, mortality is influenced by veterinary care, diet, and protection from predation. Reproduction is influenced by controlling access of breeding animals to each other or by contraception. In the grizzly bear population of the GYE, managers can influence the demographics by garbage cleanup practices or by limiting human access to prime habitat where grizzly bears would prefer to feed. Managers can also influence the grizzly bear demographics more directly by the removal or killing of the “nuisance bears” that have become conditioned to human Lisa Faust is a

[1]  LELAND J. JACKSON,et al.  An Introduction to the Practice of Ecological Modeling , 2000 .

[2]  L. Eberhardt,et al.  How many grizzlies in Yellowstone , 1996 .

[3]  K. Watt Systems analysis in ecology , 1967 .

[4]  John R Fieberg,et al.  A Practical Handbook for Population Viability Analysis , 1999 .

[5]  H. Picton,et al.  Climate, carrying capacity, and the Yellowstone grizzly bear , 1986 .

[6]  William E. Grant,et al.  Ecology and Natural Resource Management: Systems Analysis and Simulation , 1997 .

[7]  R. Lande,et al.  Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[8]  Azmy S. Ackleh,et al.  Giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) population dynamics and bamboo (subfamily Bambusoideae) life history: a structured population approach to examining carrying capacity when the prey are semelparous , 1999 .

[9]  Richard Frankham,et al.  Comparison of the population viability analysis packages GAPPS, INMAT, RAMAS and VORTEX for the whooping crane (Grus americana) , 1999 .

[10]  L. Eberhardt,et al.  Population dynamics of Yellowstone grizzly bears , 1985 .

[11]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Review of the Generic Computer Programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for Modelling the Viability of Wildlife Metapopulations , 1995 .

[12]  Paul Beier,et al.  Population viability analysis. , 2016 .

[13]  T. Foose,et al.  Demographic and genetic management of captive populations , 1996 .

[14]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Modeling For Learning Organizations , 1994 .

[15]  S. Thompson,et al.  Using stage‐based system dynamics modeling for demographic management of captive populations , 2003 .

[16]  V. Marín A simple-biology, stage-structured population model of the spring dynamics of Calanus chilensis at Mejillones del Sur Bay, Chile , 1997 .

[17]  F. Huettmann "Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis" by W. F. Morris and D. F. Doak. 2002. [book review] , 2003 .

[18]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[19]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics models of environmental systems. Andrew Ford Island Press, Washington DC, 1999, viii + 401 pp. ISBN: 1-55963-601-7 , 2003 .

[20]  John Sabo,et al.  Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA , 2003 .

[21]  Kenneth E. F. Watt,et al.  Systems Analysis in Ecology , 1967 .

[22]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[23]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[24]  S. Thompson,et al.  Birth sex ratio in captive mammals: Patterns, biases, and the implications for management and conservation , 2000 .

[25]  John W. Hearne,et al.  Using models in the management of Black Rhino populations , 2002 .

[26]  R. Wielgus Minimum viable population and reserve sizes for naturally regulated grizzly bears in British Columbia , 2002 .

[27]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Biological Systems , 1999, Modeling Dynamic Systems.