Cross-training in a cellular manufacturing environment

This study addresses the need for cross-training in a cellular manufacturing environment. It is demonstrated that an effective cross-training situation results if workers and machines are connected, directly or indirectly, by task assignment decisions. The connections between workers and machines (i.e. the qualifications of workers) form 'chains' that can be used to reallocate work from heavily loaded workers to less loaded workers. This provides the possibility of a balanced workload situation among workers, something that is desirable from a social as well as an economic viewpoint. Based on this insight, we have developed an integer programming (IP) model that can be used to select workers to be cross-trained for particular machines. The model may help in trade-offs between training costs and the workload balance among workers in a manufacturing cell. The workload balance indicates the usefulness of labor flexibility in a particular situation. A numerical example is presented to illustrate various elements and features of the model. It also provides further insight into the role of 'chaining' workers and machines. The industrial applicability of the model and directions for future research are also indicated.

[1]  S. E. Jackson.  The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams , 1996 .

[2]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions underlying the Analysis of Variance and Covariance. , 1972 .

[3]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[4]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  The evolution of a cellular manufacturing system: a longitudinal case study , 2002 .

[5]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[6]  G. Margaret Fazakerley,et al.  A research report on the human aspects of group technology and cellular manufacture , 1976 .

[7]  Paul M. Bobrowski,et al.  Job release and labor flexibility in a dual resource constrained job shop , 1989 .

[8]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  A multi-objective procedure for labour assignments and grouping in capacitated cell formation problems , 2001 .

[9]  D. B. Webster,et al.  Mathematical models for developing a flexible workforce , 1994 .

[10]  Gürsel A. Süer.  Optimal operator assignment and cell loading in labor-intensive manufacturing cells , 1996 .

[11]  Paul M. Bobrowski,et al.  An evaluation of labor assignment rules when workers are not perfectly interchangeable , 1993 .

[12]  C. A. Carnall,et al.  SEMI‐AUTONOMOUS WORK GROUPS AND THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF THE ORGANIZATION , 1982 .

[13]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Context and consistency in absenteeism: studying social and dispositional influences across multiple settings , 2003 .

[14]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .

[15]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  Worker assignment in cellular manufacturing considering technical and human skills , 2002 .

[16]  Dave Ulrich,et al.  The Boundaryless Organization , 1995 .

[17]  S. Parker,et al.  Correlates of Employee Attitudes Toward Functional Flexibility , 1993 .

[18]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  Managing worker flexibility and attrition in dual resource constrained job shops , 1995 .

[19]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  A statistical comparison of the performance of simple dispatching rules for a particular set of job shops , 1976 .

[20]  E. Molleman,et al.  Empowerment and team development , 1998 .

[21]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Acquiring and operationalizing worker flexibility in dual resource constrained job shops with worker transfer delays and learning losses , 1994 .

[23]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  Functional flexibility and team performance , 1999 .

[24]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  Multi-level heterogeneous worker flexibility in a Dual Resource Constrained (DRC) job-shop , 2001 .

[25]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  The Impact of Learning and Labor Attrition on Worker Flexibility in Dual Resource Constrained Job Shops , 1993 .

[26]  Michael J. Brusco,et al.  Staffing a Multiskilled Workforce with Varying Levels of Productivity: An Analysis of Cross‐training Policies* , 1998 .

[27]  Hokey Min,et al.  Simultaneous formation of machine and human cells in group technology: a multiple objective approach , 1993 .

[28]  Keebom Kang,et al.  Cross-Utilization of Workers Whose Capabilities Differ , 1999 .

[29]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[30]  A. van den Beukel,et al.  Multifunctionality: Driving and constraining forces , 1998 .

[31]  Mark D. Treleven.  A Review of the Dual Resource Constrained System Research , 1989 .

[32]  Jc Jan Fransoo,et al.  Identification of aggregate resource and job set characteristics for predicting job set makespan in batch process industries , 2000 .

[33]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Forming effective worker teams for cellular manufacturing , 2001 .

[34]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[35]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[36]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[37]  T. R. Johns,et al.  Cross‐utilization of a two‐skilled workforce , 1998 .

[38]  Jon Clark,et al.  Human resource management and technical change , 1994 .

[39]  David B. Kaber,et al.  A framework for training workers in contemporary manufacturing environments , 1999, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..