Sustainability of Biorefineries: Challenges and Perspectives

: Biorefineries have been defined as complex systems where biomass is integrally processed to obtain value-added products and energy vectors, involving recent research advances, technological trends, and sustainable practices. These facilities are evolving since new pathways and challenges for biomass upgrading appear constantly aimed at increasing process sustainability. Nevertheless, few literature papers summarize how these new trends can improve biorefinery sustainability and boost the transition to renewable resources. This paper reviews several challenges and future perspectives before biorefinery implementation at the industrial level. Challenges related to waste stream valoriza-tion, multifeedstock use, biorefinery energy matrix diversification, and new products based on new biomass conversion pathways are reviewed. Thus, this paper provides an overview of the most recent trends and perspectives for improving biorefinery sustainability based on waste stream minimization, integral use of raw materials, and high-value bio-based compound production. A case study is discussed to show how integral biomass upgrading can improve the economic and environmental performance of existing processing facilities. Carbon dioxide capture, storage, and conversion, as well as energy matrix diversification, have been identified as the most important aspects of improving the environmental performance of biorefineries (decarbonization). Moreover, multifeedstock biorefineries are profiled as promising options for upgrading several biomass sources in small-scale and modular systems to produce value-added products for boosting rural bioeconomies. Finally, new ways to produce more bio-based products must be proposed to replace existing oil-based ones

[1]  Haiyong Wang,et al.  Zeolite catalysts for the valorization of biomass into platform compounds and biochemicals/biofuels: A review , 2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[2]  C. A. Alzate,et al.  Potential and Restrictions of Food-Waste Valorization through Fermentation Processes , 2023, Fermentation.

[3]  S. Gheewala,et al.  Optimization of food-fuel-fibre in biorefinery based on environmental and economic assessment: The case of sugarcane utilization in Thailand , 2023, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[4]  Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha,et al.  A life cycle assessment perspective on biodiesel production from fish wastes for green microgrids in a circular bioeconomy , 2023, Bioresource Technology Reports.

[5]  M. Aghbashlo,et al.  Marine shell-based biorefinery: A sustainable solution for aquaculture waste valorization , 2023, Renewable Energy.

[6]  D. Chiaramonti,et al.  Conceptual design and techno-economic assessment of coupled hydrothermal liquefaction and aqueous phase reforming of lignocellulosic residues , 2023, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.

[7]  Hemansi,et al.  Enhanced cellulosic ethanol production via fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of sequential dilute acid-alkali pretreated sugarcane bagasse. , 2023, Bioresource technology.

[8]  C. A. Alzate,et al.  Life cycle assessment and potential geolocation of a multi-feedstock biorefinery: Integration of the avocado and plantain value chains in rural zones , 2022, Bioresource Technology Reports.

[9]  M. Zielińska,et al.  Individual Phenolic Acids in Distillery Stillage Inhibit Its Biomethanization , 2022, Energies.

[10]  J. Solarte-Toro,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA) and social impact assessment (SIA) of small-scale biorefineries implemented in rural zones: the avocado (Persea Americana var. Americana) case in Colombia , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  M. Taherzadeh,et al.  Demo-Scale Production of Protein-Rich Fungal Biomass from Potato Protein Liquor for Use as Innovative Food and Feed Products , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  C. A. Cardona-Alzate,et al.  Detailed economic assessment of polylactic acid production by using glucose platform: sugarcane bagasse, coffee cut stems, and plantain peels as possible raw materials , 2022, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.

[13]  Seth Apollo,et al.  Performance and kinetics of a fluidized bed anaerobic reactor treating distillery effluent , 2022, Physical Sciences Reviews.

[14]  P. Show,et al.  Isolation of indole-3-acetic acid-producing Azospirillum brasilense from Vietnamese wet rice: co-immobilization of isolate and microalgae as a sustainable biorefinery. , 2022, Journal of biotechnology.

[15]  I. O’Hara,et al.  Biorefining within food loss and waste frameworks: A review , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[16]  P. Show,et al.  Application of microwave plasma technology to convert carbon dioxide (CO2) into high value products: A review , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[17]  E. Udemba,et al.  Energy transition and diversification: A pathway to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazil , 2022, Energy.

[18]  Alei Ahmadi Kasani,et al.  Software tools for microalgae biorefineries: Cultivation, separation, conversion process integration, modeling, and optimization , 2022, Algal Research.

[19]  G. B. Benitez,et al.  Sustainable conditions for the development of renewable energy systems: A triple bottom line perspective , 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[20]  K. Bułkowska,et al.  Valorization of Distillery Stillage for Bioenergy Production: A Review , 2021, Energies.

[21]  M. Puri,et al.  Global Status of Lignocellulosic Biorefinery: Challenges and Perspectives. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[22]  R. Solera,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge, wine vinasse and poultry manure for bio-hydrogen production , 2021, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[23]  C. A. Alzate,et al.  A comprehensive review on the economic assessment of biorefineries: The first step towards sustainable biomass conversion , 2021 .

[24]  R. Pietzcker,et al.  Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector , 2021, Applied Energy.

[25]  A. Dias,et al.  Comparative Social Life Cycle Assessment of Two Biomass-to-Electricity Systems , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  R. Dickson,et al.  A strategy for advanced biofuel production and emission utilization from macroalgal biorefinery using superstructure optimization , 2021 .

[27]  A. Pugazhendhi,et al.  Valorization of agricultural residues: Different biorefinery routes , 2021 .

[28]  Jo‐Shu Chang,et al.  Liquid triphasic systems as sustainable downstream processing of Chlorella sp. biorefinery for potential biofuels and feed production. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[29]  J. Görgens,et al.  Techno-economics of lignocellulose biorefineries at South African sugar mills using the biofine process to co-produce levulinic acid, furfural and electricity along with gamma valeractone , 2021 .

[30]  C. A. Alzate,et al.  The potential use of lignin as a platform product in biorefineries: A review , 2021 .

[31]  C. C. Ariel,et al.  A comprehensive approach for biorefineries design based on experimental data, conceptual and optimization methodologies: The orange peel waste case. , 2021, Bioresource technology.

[32]  Sonal K. Thengane,et al.  Life cycle assessment of rice husk torrefaction and prospects for decentralized facilities at rice mills , 2020 .

[33]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach , 2020 .

[34]  A. J. Cruz,et al.  Economic analysis of a second-generation ethanol and electricity biorefinery using superstructural optimization , 2020 .

[35]  R. Giudici,et al.  Physiological characterization of a new thermotolerant yeast strain isolated during Brazilian ethanol production, and its application in high-temperature fermentation , 2020, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[36]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental sustainability of valorisation routes for spent coffee grounds: From waste to resources , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[37]  J. Tester,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion Technologies Applied to Poultry Litter with Energy and Nutrient Recovery , 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.

[38]  Jun Gao,et al.  Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming , 2020, Energy.

[39]  D. Mikulski,et al.  Microwave-assisted dilute acid pretreatment in bioethanol production from wheat and rye stillages , 2020 .

[40]  P. Bhoi,et al.  Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis , 2020 .

[41]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  The social, economic, and environmental implications of biomass ethanol production in China: A multi-regional input-output-based hybrid LCA model , 2020 .

[42]  Nishu,et al.  A review on the catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for the bio-oil production with ZSM-5: Focus on structure , 2020 .

[43]  J. Solarte-Toro,et al.  Economic and social assessment of biorefineries: The case of Coffee Cut-Stems (CCS) in Colombia , 2020 .

[44]  L. Ahmadi,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of small scale biomass supply chain and bioenergy production systems in carbon credit markets: A life cycle perspective , 2020 .

[45]  L. Brumano,et al.  Innovation and strategic orientations for the development of advanced biorefineries. , 2020, Bioresource technology.

[46]  Nana Baah Appiah-Nkansah,et al.  A review of sweet sorghum as a viable renewable bioenergy crop and its techno-economic analysis , 2019 .

[47]  A. Chimphango,et al.  Feasibility of commercial waste biorefineries for cassava starch industries: Techno-economic assessment. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[48]  S. Luostarinen,et al.  LCA of anaerobic digestion: Emission allocation for energy and digestate , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[49]  Nicholas E. Matthews,et al.  Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: Towards a framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment , 2019, Sustainable production and consumption.

[50]  F. Sabatini Culture as Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development: Perspectives for Integration, Paradigms of Action , 2019, European Journal of Sustainable Development.

[51]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[52]  Snehesh Shivananda Ail,et al.  Experimental investigations of air-CO2 biomass gasification in reversed downdraft gasifier , 2019, Fuel.

[53]  E. Alemayehu,et al.  A review on progresses and performances in distillery stillage management , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[54]  I. Kozhevnikov,et al.  Heteropoly acid catalysis for the isomerization of biomass-derived limonene oxide and kinetic separation of the trans-isomer in green solvents , 2019, Applied Catalysis A: General.

[55]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of hydrogen from biomass gasification: A comparison with conventional hydrogen , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[56]  Z. Ren,et al.  Directing Clostridium ljungdahlii fermentation products via hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio in syngas , 2019, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[57]  D. D. De Vos,et al.  Protein-Rich Biomass Waste as a Resource for Future Biorefineries: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities. , 2019, ChemSusChem.

[58]  Antonis C. Kokossis,et al.  A Total Site Synthesis approach for the selection, integration and planning of multiple-feedstock biorefineries , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[59]  B. Kulkarni,et al.  Process of fruit peel waste biorefinery: a case study of citrus waste biorefinery, its environmental impacts and recommendations , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[60]  Tobias Heimann,et al.  Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs? , 2019, Earth's Future.

[61]  N. Dahmen,et al.  Integrated lignocellulosic value chains in a growing bioeconomy: Status quo and perspectives , 2019, GCB Bioenergy.

[62]  T. Namioka,et al.  Low-temperature trace light-tar reforming in biomass syngas by atmospheric hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis , 2018, Fuel Processing Technology.

[63]  C. Cardona,et al.  Potential raw materials for biorefineries to ensure food security: The Cocoyam case , 2018, Industrial Crops and Products.

[64]  D. Mikulski,et al.  Efficiency of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of distillery stillage in the production of cellulosic ethanol. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[65]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[66]  Carlos Ariel Cardona Alzate,et al.  Fermentation, thermochemical and catalytic processes in the transformation of biomass through efficient biorefineries , 2018 .

[67]  Ramiro Betancourt,et al.  Energetic and environmental assessment of thermochemical and biochemical ways for producing energy from agricultural solid residues: Coffee Cut-Stems case. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[68]  B Jonathan Moncada,et al.  Design strategies for sustainable biorefineries , 2016 .

[69]  R. Sheldon Green chemistry, catalysis and valorization of waste biomass , 2016 .

[70]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  Biodiesel-triple bottom line (TBL): A new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of principles criteria & indicators (PC&I) for biodiesel production. Part II-validation , 2016 .

[71]  C. Cardona,et al.  Comparison of lignin extraction processes: Economic and environmental assessment. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[72]  Arturo Sanchez,et al.  Bi-dimensional sustainability analysis of a multi-feed biorefinery design for biofuels co-production from lignocellulosic residues and agro-industrial wastes , 2016 .

[73]  Patricia Luis,et al.  Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: Consequences and alternatives , 2016 .

[74]  D. Das,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the hydrogen production by mixed consortium, synthetic co-culture and pure culture using distillery effluent. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[75]  L. Horlings The inner dimension of sustainability: personal and cultural values , 2015 .

[76]  Saul Sitati Namango,et al.  Strategies for improvement of biohydrogen production from organic-rich wastewater: a review. , 2015 .

[77]  Fu-Li Li,et al.  Physiological response of Clostridium ljungdahlii DSM 13528 of ethanol production under different fermentation conditions. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[78]  Carlos A. Cardona,et al.  Integrating first, second, and third generation biorefineries: Incorporating microalgae into the sugarcane biorefinery , 2014 .

[79]  N. Sultana,et al.  Enzymatic biotransformation of terpenes as bioactive agents , 2013, Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry.

[80]  Rajinikanth Rajagopal,et al.  A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[81]  V. Vučurović,et al.  Sugar beet pulp as support for Saccharomyces cerivisiae immobilization in bioethanol production , 2012 .

[82]  C. Zhou,et al.  Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[83]  J. Siles,et al.  Integrated ozonation and biomethanization treatments of vinasse derived from ethanol manufacturing. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[84]  R. Edyvean,et al.  Inhibition of biogas production and biodegradability by substituted phenolic compounds in anaerobic sludge. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[85]  Huajiang Huang,et al.  A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries , 2008 .

[86]  P. Shepherd,et al.  Biomass co-firing: A renewable alternative for utilities , 2000 .

[87]  Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho,et al.  Production and Recovery of Limonene-1,2-Diol and Simultaneous Resolution of a Diastereomeric Mixture of Limonene-1,2-Epoxide with whole Cells of Rhodococcus Erythropolis DCL14 , 2000 .

[88]  James M. Douglas,et al.  Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes , 1988 .

[89]  J. Solarte-Toro,et al.  Sustainability analysis of biorefineries based on country socio-economic and environmental context. , 2022 .

[90]  F. Berruti,et al.  Review of the impact of socio-economic conditions on the development and implementation of biorefineries , 2022, Fuel.

[91]  Lifang Chen,et al.  Systematic screening of bifunctional ionic liquid for intensifying esterification of methyl heptanoate in the reactive extraction process , 2021 .

[92]  A. Amarasekara,et al.  Catalytic upgrading of biomass derived furans , 2021 .

[93]  Parisi Claudia Distribution of the bio-based industry in the EU , 2020 .

[94]  Ganti S. Murthy,et al.  Systems Analysis Frameworks for Biorefineries , 2019, Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes for the Production of Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels.

[95]  N. P. Tollamadugu,et al.  Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms as a Tool for Environmental Sustainability , 2019, Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry.

[96]  Michela Gallo,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment for eco-design of product–package systems in the food industry—The case of legumes , 2018 .

[97]  Robin Smith,et al.  Simulation and analysis of CO2 capture process with aqueous monoethanolamine solution , 2016 .

[98]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  Biodiesel-TBL+: A new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of PC&I for biodiesel production – Part I , 2016 .

[99]  R. Gani,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of different CO2-based processes for dimethyl carbonate production , 2015 .

[100]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. , 2009 .

[101]  Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho,et al.  Biotransformation of terpenes. , 2006, Biotechnology advances.

[102]  D. Leak,et al.  Opportunities in microbial biotransformation of monoterpenes , 1997 .