From Information Systems in Social Settings To Information Systems as Social Settings

Research into the social impact of automation sees automation systems as separate entities to the social systems that they affect. This paper examines this research position. Social systems are defined as systems of organisation and work involving human cooperation and inter-relations (adapted from OED 1990). It explores the possibility that some automation systems are themselves social systems. This proposition reframes the question of social impact by placing the impacting system as part of the impacted social system. Manufacturing information systems (IS) are presented as an example of automation applied to information processing. Manufacturing IS’s attempt to provide streamlined, automated information processing in their host organisations. Information systems development (ISD) methodologies are centred upon delivering a technical solution in this space. The focus upon technology in ISD de-emphasises the social impact of these systems and places the technical system outside the impacted social system. This paper briefly summarises results from an empirical study, which reveals that the delivery of a new information system means the delivery of a new social system. This social system is the primary outcome of ISD. This issue is not explicitly recognised by most current research trajectories. This paper contends that the implications of this are extremely significant for research and development of complex automata for information systems.

[1]  R. Boland,et al.  The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action☆ , 1989 .

[2]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  Janko Černetič,et al.  A Soft Change-Management Approach Applied to Information Systems Development , 1999 .

[4]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[5]  J. Couger,et al.  Enhancing the creativity of reengineering. Techniques for making IS more creative , 1994 .

[6]  Ralph W. Thomas,et al.  The Oxford Dictionary , 1907 .

[7]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Why users cannot “get what they want” , 1993, SIGO.

[8]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  The Pretence of Knowledge , 1975 .

[9]  Myrvin Chester,et al.  Reconciling the Human, Organisational, and Technical Factors of is Development , 1999 .

[10]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[11]  Drew McDermott,et al.  A critique of pure reason 1 , 1987, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  J. March.  Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making☆ , 1987 .

[14]  Jawed I. A. Siddiqi,et al.  Challenging universal truths of requirements engineering , 1994, IEEE Software.

[15]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.