Simple traits do not predict grazing response in Australian dry shrublands and woodlands

Summary 1. Plant species composition and species response to grazing are fundamental to the management of grazing lands. Reliable prediction of grazing responses from species’ traits would be a major step forward in generalizing knowledge and management beyond the locality. Recently results have been presented showing that plant species’ responses to grazing in subhumid grasslands in Argentina and Israel could be predicted from simple traits: height, leaf size, life history and specific leaf area (SLA). This study assessed whether those relationships between traits and grazing responses hold for Australian semi-arid and arid shrublands and woodlands. 2. Eleven lists of grazing responses from five published grazing studies were matched with a plant trait data set. Trait distributions were compared between response groups pooled across studies. Relationships between traits and grazing response were also assessed, both within and across studies, using meta-analysis. 3. Overall there was little evidence for predictability of grazing responses with simple traits in the semi-arid and arid shrublands and woodlands. There were relationships between grazing response and life history and growth form, and some weak evidence for grazing increasers having high SLA. 4. Synthesis and applications . It was concluded that prediction of grazing responses with simple traits is less clear in semi-arid and arid rangelands, which are characterized by openness at ground level and high diversity of growth forms, compared with subhumid grasslands that have structurally simple, continuous swards. The finding that species’ traits may have differing predictive capacity for grazing responses in different situations means that we need more empirical studies in different situations. The most important contrasts between situations for investigation are likely to be on axes of rainfall/productivity and evolutionary history of grazing.

[1]  A. J. Belsky,et al.  Effects of grazing, competition, disturbance and fire on species composition and diversity in grassland communities , 1992 .

[2]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[3]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits: evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands , 1992 .

[4]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types , 2001 .

[5]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments , 1993 .

[6]  N. Chiariello,et al.  Allocating Resources to Reproduction and DefenseNew assessments of the costs and benefits of allocation patterns in plants are relating ecological roles to resource use , 1987 .

[7]  G. Pickup,et al.  The stewardship of arid Australia: ecology and landscape management , 1995 .

[8]  M. Westoby.  An Analysis of Diet Selection by Large Generalist Herbivores , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Grazing response groups among understorey plants in arid rangelands , 1999 .

[10]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale , 1998 .

[11]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species , 2001 .

[12]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[13]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. , 1995 .

[14]  Damian Barrett,et al.  Steady state turnover time of carbon in the Australian terrestrial biosphere , 2002 .

[15]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Scale‐related effects of grazing on native plant communities in an arid rangeland region of South Australia , 2002 .

[16]  R. Lange,et al.  Development of a new piosphere in arid chenopod shrubland grazed by sheep. 2. Changes to the vegetation , 1986 .

[17]  John A. Taylor,et al.  General effects of management and grazing by domestic livestock on the rangelands of the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales. , 1976 .

[18]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Random effects models. , 1994 .

[19]  C. James,et al.  The effects of artificial sources of water on rangeland biodiversity: Final report to the Biodiversity Convention and Strategy Section of the Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia , 1997 .

[20]  M. Gutman,et al.  Responses of mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. , 1989 .

[21]  R. Cowan,et al.  Australian Plant Name Index , 1992 .

[22]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Meta-analysis in ecology , 2001 .

[23]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[24]  M. Westoby.  The LHS strategy scheme in relation to grazing and fire , 1999 .

[25]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Disturbance response in vegetation – towards a global perspective on functional traits , 1999 .

[26]  M. Westoby,et al.  Hypotheses on Seed Size: Tests Using the Semiarid Flora of Western New South Wales, Australia , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[27]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[28]  M. Westoby,et al.  Predicting plant species’ responses to grazing , 2001 .

[29]  S. Díaz,et al.  Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits , 2001 .