Estimating susceptibility of biological control agents to pesticides: influence of life history strategies and population structure

Abstract In this study we examined the influences that differing life history strategies and population structures at the time of pesticide exposure have on population susceptibility to pesticides. We used life table data and a matrix projection model to incorporate combinations of mortality (lethal effect) and reductions in fecundity (sublethal effect) into estimates of intrinsic population growth rates ( r ) for a predator, the seven-spot lady beetle, Coccinella septempunctata L., and its prey, the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, and an aphid parasitoid, Diaeretiella rapae (M’Intosh). All three species exhibited differences in key life history variables. The aphid had the highest r and shortest generation time, the ladybeetle had the lowest r and longest generation, while the parasitoid exhibited intermediate life history characteristics. When the model was run with populations started as neonates (aphids) or eggs (lady beetle, parasitoid) for each species, ladybeetle populations were much more susceptible than either aphid or parasitoid populations 30 days after simulated exposure to a pesticide. For example, 50% mortality and a 50% reduction in fecundity resulted in a population headed toward extinction (negative r ) for the ladybeetle while the parasitoid population grew exponentially (positive r ) even after sustaining 70% mortality and a 70% reduction in fecundity. The aphid species maintained exponential growth after sustaining 80% mortality and an 80% reduction in fecundity. Thus, differences in life history variables accounted for the greater susceptibility of the ladybeetle to a pesticide than its aphid prey or the parasitoid over a set time interval. These differences in susceptibility were greatly reduced when the model was run starting with a mixed age/stage population (the stable age distribution) for each species indicating that population structure at the time of pesticide exposure plays a critical role in population susceptibility. These results suggest that life history attributes as well as population structure at the time of pesticide exposure both play a major role in population susceptibility to pesticides, highlighting the need to explicitly consider differences in life history variables among species when calculating compatibility of pesticides and biological control agents as well as the population structure of beneficial species at the time of pesticide application.

[1]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Risk assessment on the basis of simplified life‐history scenarios , 1997 .

[2]  W. Hunter,et al.  Effects of Host Plant and Temperature on the Biology of Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) , 1999 .

[3]  D. Pimentel,et al.  THE INTRINSIC RATE OF NATURAL INCREASE OF THE GREEN PEACH APHID, MYZUS PERSICAE (SULZER) (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE), ON COLLARDS (BRASSICA OLERACEA L.) , 1985, The Canadian Entomologist.

[4]  P. Calow,et al.  Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population‐level effects in ecotoxicology? , 1999 .

[5]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[6]  John E Banks,et al.  Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  J. Bernal,et al.  Reproduction of Diaeretiella rapae on Russian wheat aphid hosts at different temperatures , 1997 .

[8]  D. K. Reed,et al.  Comparative life table statistics of Diaeretiella rapae and Aphidius matricariae on the Russian wheat aphid. , 1992 .

[9]  P. H. Leslie On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. , 1945, Biometrika.

[10]  Robert A. Goldstein,et al.  Inferring ecological risk from toxicity bioassays , 1996 .

[11]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[12]  Jan E. Kammenga,et al.  Stress induced fitness reduction is not determined by the most sensitive life-cycle trait. , 1996 .

[13]  J. Stark,et al.  Importance of population structure at the time of toxicant exposure. , 1999, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  Coexistence in Laboratory Populations of Paramecium Aurelia and Its Predator Didinium Nasutum , 1973 .

[15]  M. J. Steenis Intrinsic rate of increase of Aphidius colemani Vier. (Hym., Braconidae), a parasitoid of Aphis gossypii Glov. (Hom., Aphididae), at different temperatures , 1993 .

[16]  A. Zaitoon,et al.  Biological Parameters for Four Coccinellid Species in Central Saudi Arabia , 1996 .

[17]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator–prey interactions , 1987, Nature.

[18]  J. Stark,et al.  Comparison of two population‐level ecotoxicological endpoints: The intrinsic (rm) and instantaneous (ri) rates of increase , 1997 .

[19]  Tong‐Xian Liu,et al.  Life history of Nephaspis oculatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a predator of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) , 1997 .

[20]  M. C. Newman,et al.  Ecotoxicology: A Hierarchical Treatment , 1996 .

[21]  J. Stark,et al.  What is ecotoxicology? An ad‐hoc grab bag or an interdisciplinary science? , 1998 .

[22]  P. S. Messenger Use of Life Tables in a Bioclimatic Study of an Experimental Aphid‐Braconid Wasp Host‐Parasite System , 1964 .

[23]  M. Mackauer,et al.  REPRODUCTION AND LONGEVITY OF CABBAGE APHID, BREVICORYNE BRASSICAE (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE), PARASITIZED BY DIAERETIELLA RAPAE (HYMENOPTERA: APHIDIIDAE) , 1984, The Canadian Entomologist.

[24]  J. Stark,et al.  Reproductive potential: its influence on the susceptibility of a species to pesticides. , 1997, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[25]  G. F. Gause The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[26]  C. Huffaker Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[27]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[28]  M. Cohen,et al.  INTRINSIC RATE OF INCREASE AND TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENTS OF THE APHID PARASITE EPHEDRUS CALIFORNICUS BAKER (HYMENOPTERA: APHIDIDAE) , 1987, The Canadian Entomologist.