Comparison of Esophageal pH and Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in Pediatric Patients With Suspected Gastroesophageal Reflux

Background: Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) is a pH-independent method of assessing gastroesophageal reflux. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MII-pH as compared with conventional pH monitoring in detecting reflux events (REs) and symptom association in different age groups. Methods: A prospective direct comparison of 2 diagnostic techniques on 291 consecutive patients referred for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of MII-pH versus pH monitoring and symptom association were measured. Results: MII-pH detected 13631 REs, 6260 (46%) of which were nonacid. The prevalence of weakly acid refluxes in the 24 hours and postprandial period as well as the proximal extension of refluxate were significantly greater in infants as compared with children (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.01, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of combined MII-pH in revealing all RE and acid RE were significantly higher in infants as compared with children (92% vs 82%, P < 0.01 and 83% vs 76%, P < 0.04, respectively). The addition of MII to conventional pH monitoring significantly increases the diagnostic yield of symptom association analysis in revealing an association between atypical symptoms and refluxes irrespective of age, whereas in studying typical symptoms it was true only for infants. Conclusions: Addition of MII to conventional pH monitoring significantly increases the diagnostic yield in detecting REs, prevalently in infants, and in revealing an association between refluxes and symptoms, prevalently respiratory ones and in infants group.

[1]  R. Francavilla,et al.  Multichannel intraluminal impedance to detect relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and apnoea of prematurity. , 2007, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[2]  A. Hila,et al.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[3]  F. Woodley,et al.  Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux Reports in Infants: A Comparison of Esophageal pH Monitoring and Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Measurements , 2006, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[4]  J. O'connor,et al.  Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in pediatric patients with asthma using impedance-pH monitoring. , 2006, The Journal of pediatrics.

[5]  J. Silny,et al.  Twenty-Four-Hour Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring in Healthy Preterm Neonates: Rate and Characteristics of Acid, Weakly Acidic, and Weakly Alkaline Gastroesophageal Reflux , 2006, Pediatrics.

[6]  F. Cresi,et al.  Relationship between gastro‐oesophageal reflux and gastric activity in newborns assessed by combined intraluminal impedance, pH metry and epigastric impedance , 2006, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[7]  R. Rosen,et al.  The sensitivity of multichannel intraluminal impedance and the pH probe in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in children. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[8]  J. O'connor,et al.  Evaluation of Infantile Acid and Nonacid Gastroesophageal Reflux Using Combined pH Monitoring and Impedance Measurement , 2005, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[9]  J. Richter,et al.  Direct Comparison of Impedance, Manometry, and pH Probe in Detecting Reflux Before and After a Meal , 2005, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[10]  A. Smout,et al.  What is the optimal time window in symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data? , 1994, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[11]  R. Rosen,et al.  The Importance of Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance in the Evaluation of Children with Persistent Respiratory Symptoms , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  J. Dent,et al.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux , 2004, Gut.

[13]  J. Peters,et al.  Twenty-Four Hour Ambulatory Simultaneous Impedance and pH Monitoring: A Multicenter Report of Normal Values From 60 Healthy Volunteers , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[14]  C. Rudolph Supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux in children: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Barnes,et al.  Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. , 2002, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[16]  J. Silny,et al.  Esophageal pH Monitoring and Impedance Measurement: A Comparison of Two Diagnostic Tests for Gastroesophageal Reflux , 2002, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[17]  R. Baker,et al.  Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Infants and Children: Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition , 2001, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[18]  D. Bush,et al.  Dual pH probe monitoring versus single pH probe monitoring in infants on milk feeds: the impact on diagnosis , 1999, Archives of disease in childhood.

[19]  J. Silny,et al.  Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory phenomena in infants: status of the intraluminal impedance technique. , 1999, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[20]  B. Weusten,et al.  The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. , 1994, Gastroenterology.

[21]  A. Smout,et al.  The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording. , 1991, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[22]  W. Wu,et al.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. , 1988, The American journal of gastroenterology.