A Maximum Entropy Estimator for the Aggregate Hierarchical Logit Model

A new approach for estimating the aggregate hierarchical logit model is presented. Though usually derived from random utility theory assuming correlated stochastic errors, the model can also be derived as a solution to a maximum entropy problem. Under the latter approach, the Lagrange multipliers of the optimization problem can be understood as parameter estimators of the model. Based on theoretical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations of a transportation demand model, it is demonstrated that the maximum entropy estimators have statistical properties that are superior to classical maximum likelihood estimators, particularly for small or medium-size samples. The simulations also generated reduced bias in the estimates of the subjective value of time and consumer surplus.

[1]  J. E. Fernández,et al.  Combined Models with Hierarchical Demand Choices: A Multi‐Objective Entropy Optimization Approach , 2008 .

[2]  Tschangho John Kim,et al.  Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Florian,et al.  Network Equilibrium Models with Combined Modes , 1994, Transp. Sci..

[4]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Implementation and Computational Issues for Combined Models of Location, Destination, Mode, and Route Choice , 1983 .

[5]  Inge Thorsen,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Model Specifications to Predict Commuting Flows , 1998 .

[6]  Louis de Grange,et al.  A Microeconomic Interpretation of the Maximum Entropy Estimator of Multinomial Logit Models and Its Equivalence to the Maximum Likelihood Estimator , 2010, Entropy.

[7]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Validation of Multiclass Urban Travel Forecasting Models Combining Origin-Destination, Mode, and Route Choices , 2003 .

[8]  Alan Wilson,et al.  Entropy in urban and regional modelling , 1972, Handbook on Entropy, Complexity and Spatial Dynamics.

[9]  T. Abrahamsson,et al.  Formulation and Estimation of Combined Network Equilibrium Models with Applications to Stockholm , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[10]  Ángel Marín,et al.  Network equilibrium with combined modes: models and solution algorithms , 2005 .

[11]  Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Modelling hierarchical destination choice ( US migrants). , 1986 .

[12]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  A New Set of Spatial-Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations † , 1983 .

[13]  L. Grange,et al.  A Consolidated Model of Trip Distribution , 2010 .

[14]  D. Boyce,et al.  NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM MODELS OF URBAN LOCATION AND TRAVEL CHOICES: A RETROSPECTIVE SURVEY. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1988 .

[15]  W. I. Morrison,et al.  A LAGRANGIAN MULTIPLIER APPROACH TO THE SOLUTION OF A SPECIAL CONSTRAINED MATRIX PROBLEM , 1980 .

[16]  Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.  A Combined Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, Modal Split, and Trip Assignment Model , 1988, Transp. Sci..

[17]  Stéphane Brice,et al.  DERIVATION OF NESTED TRANSPORT MODELS WITHIN A MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK , 1989 .

[18]  A. Anas.  Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models , 1983 .

[19]  H. Williams.  On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[20]  Angel Ibeas,et al.  A Hierarchical Gravity Model with Spatial Correlation: Mathematical Formulation and Parameter Estimation , 2011 .

[21]  Shu-Cherng Fang,et al.  Linearly-Constrained Entropy Maximization Problem with Quadratic Cost and Its Applications to Transportation Planning Problems , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[22]  Norbert Oppenheim,et al.  Urban Travel Demand Modeling: From Individual Choices to General Equilibrium , 1995 .