Many pathology departments are introducing subspecialty sign-out in surgical pathology. In 2014, the University of Vermont Medical Center transitioned from general sign-out to partial subspecialty sign-out to include gastrointestinal and breast/cervix subspecialty benches; other specimens remained on general benches. Our experiences with the transition are described, including attending pathologist, trainee, support staff, and clinician satisfaction. A survey was e-mailed to all University of Vermont Medical Center anatomic pathology attendings, pathology trainees, pathologist assistants and grossing technicians, and clinicians who send surgical pathology specimens, immediately before and 1 year after transitioning to partial subspecialty sign-out. Quality assurance metrics were obtained for the 18 months prior to and following the transition. Gastrointestinal and breast/cervix attendings were more satisfied with partial subspecialty sign-out compared to those on the general benches. Overall, trainees were more satisfied with general sign-out because of the rotation schedule but preferred partial subspecialty sign-out due to improved teaching and more focused learning while on subspecialty benches. Clinicians remained very satisfied with our department and our reports; no differences were observed. Turnaround time was unchanged. After switching to partial subspecialty sign-out, there were significantly fewer discrepancies following multidisciplinary conference review for gastrointestinal and breast/cervix cases but remained the same for general cases. Fewer formal internal consults were performed after transitioning to partial subspecialty sign-out across all areas, but more notable for gastrointestinal and breast/cervix cases. Our data show improved quality assurance metrics and trainee education in a subspecialty sign-out setting compared to general sign-out setting.
[1]
N. Harris,et al.
Subspecialization of surgical pathology at the Massachusetts General Hospital.
,
1996,
American journal of clinical pathology.
[2]
J. Watts.
Is there still a need for the general surgical pathologist?
,
1996,
American journal of clinical pathology.
[3]
N. Kirkham.
The pathologist in the 21st century—generalist or specialist?
,
2000,
Journal of clinical pathology.
[4]
Subspecialisation in cellular pathology in the DGH setting: the Warwick experience
,
2006,
Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[5]
W. Murphy,et al.
Anatomical pathology in the 21st century: the great paradigm shift.
,
2007,
Human pathology.
[6]
M. Heatley.
Subspecialisation and despecialisation in anatomical pathology
,
2010,
Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[7]
Consolidation of the North Shore-LIJ Health System anatomic pathology services: the challenge of subspecialization, operations, quality management, staffing, and education.
,
2013,
American journal of clinical pathology.
[8]
S. Sarewitz.
Subspecialization in community pathology practice.
,
2014,
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[9]
Yong-Jun Liu,et al.
Trends in extramural consultation: comparison between subspecialized and general surgical pathology service models.
,
2016,
Annals of diagnostic pathology.