Inverse filtering approach to measure directional in-plane modulation transfer function using a sphere phantom for a digital tomosynthesis system.

We propose a method to measure the directional in-plane modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital tomosynthesis system using a sphere phantom. To assess the spatial resolution of an in-plane image of the tomosynthesis system, projection data of a sphere phantom were generated within a limited data acquisition range of 40°, and reconstructed by the FDK algorithm. To measure the in-plane MTF, we divided the Fourier transform of the reconstructed sphere phantom by that of the ideal sphere phantom, and then performed plane integral along the fz-direction. When dividing, small values in the denominator can introduce estimation errors, and these errors were reduced by the proposed method. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, the in-plane MTF estimated by simulation and experimental data was compared to the ideal in-plane MTF generated by computer simulations using a point object. For quantitative evaluation, we measured frequency values at half-maximum and full-maximum of the directional in-plane MTF along the three different directions (i.e., f0° -, f30° -, and f60° -directions) and compared them with those of the ideal in-plane MTF. Although the sphere phantom has been regarded as an inappropriate object due to the anisotropic characteristics of tomosynthesis image, our results show that the proposed method has a reliable estimation performance, demonstrating the sphere phantom is still suitable for measuring the directional in-plane MTF for a digital tomosynthesis system.

[1]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  Local and global 3D noise power spectrum in cone-beam CT system with FDK reconstruction. , 2011, Medical physics.

[2]  E Samei,et al.  Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  A Sphere Phantom Approach to Measure Directional Modulation Transfer Functions for Tomosynthesis Imaging Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  A New Method to Measure Directional Modulation Transfer Function Using Sphere Phantoms in a Cone Beam Computed Tomography System , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Colleen H. Neal,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  H Bosmans,et al.  Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Feng Gao,et al.  Monotone spline regression for accurate MTF measurement at low frequencies. , 2014, Optics express.

[13]  A. Rodríguez-Ruiz,et al.  Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[14]  R. Ning,et al.  Three-dimensional point spread function measurement of cone-beam computed tomography system by iterative edge-blurring algorithm. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Image Quality Measurements in Breast Tomosynthesis , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[17]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Estimating local noise power spectrum from a few FBP-reconstructed CT scans. , 2016, Medical physics.

[19]  Ying Chen,et al.  Methodology of NEQ (f) analysis for optimization and comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis acquisition techniques and reconstruction algorithms , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  K Bliznakova,et al.  Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry. , 2010, Medical physics.

[21]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[23]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  Calibration and optimization of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis guided near infrared spectral tomography. , 2015, Biomedical optics express.

[24]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[25]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[26]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype. , 2015, Medical physics.

[27]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Development and experience of quality control methods for digital breast tomosynthesis systems. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom. , 2013, Medical physics.

[29]  Norbert J. Pelc,et al.  Use of sphere phantoms to measure the 3D MTF of FDK reconstructions , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[30]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[31]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[32]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Spatial resolution of x-ray tomosynthesis in relation to computed tomography for coronal/sagittal images of the knee , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  Paul M. W. French,et al.  Incorporation of an experimentally determined MTF for spatial frequency filtering and deconvolution during optical projection tomography reconstruction. , 2012, Optics express.

[34]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. , 2014, Medical physics.

[35]  A. Flinck,et al.  Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. , 2008, Radiology.

[36]  J Y Vaishnav,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality and dose reduction in CT iterative reconstruction. , 2014, Medical physics.

[37]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. , 2012, Medical physics.