Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of traffic density and verbal tasks on takeover performance in highly automated driving. Background: In highly automated vehicles, the driver has to occasionally take over vehicle control when approaching system limits. To ensure safety, the ability of the driver to regain control of the driving task under various driving situations and different driver states needs to be quantified. Methods: Seventy-two participants experienced takeover situations requiring an evasive maneuver on a three-lane highway with varying traffic density (zero, 10, and 20 vehicles per kilometer). In a between-subjects design, half of the participants were engaged in a verbal 20-Questions Task, representing speaking on the phone while driving in a highly automated vehicle. Results: The presence of traffic in takeover situations led to longer takeover times and worse takeover quality in the form of shorter time to collision and more collisions. The 20-Questions Task did not influence takeover time but seemed to have minor effects on the takeover quality. Conclusions: For the design and evaluation of human–machine interaction in takeover situations of highly automated vehicles, the traffic state seems to play a major role, compared to the driver state, manipulated by the 20-Questions Task. Application: The present results can be used by developers of highly automated systems to appropriately design human–machine interfaces and to assess the driver’s time budget for regaining control.

[1]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[2]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[3]  Jason S. McCarley,et al.  Mind Wandering Behind the Wheel , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Sabine Elke Schöpplein Integration fahrstreifenbezogener Kenngrößen und seitlicher Detektionsdaten in ein makroskopisches Verkehrsflussmodell für dreistreifige Richtungsfahrbahnen , 2013 .

[5]  Lutz Lorenz,et al.  Designing take over scenarios for automated driving , 2014 .

[6]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control , 2005, Ergonomics.

[7]  Frank Drews,et al.  A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , 2011 .

[9]  A. Kemeny,et al.  Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions , 2013 .

[11]  Catherine Neubauer,et al.  The Effects of Cell Phone Use and Automation on Driver Performance and Subjective State in Simulated Driving , 2012 .

[12]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[13]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Highly Automated Driving, Secondary Task Performance, and Driver State , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving , 2014 .

[15]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Naturalistic Census of Cell Phone Use , 2012 .

[16]  Ying Wang,et al.  The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[17]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Improving the Driver–Automation Interaction , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Single operator, multiple robots: an eye movement based theoretic model of operator situation awareness , 2010, HRI 2010.

[19]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Influence of Automated Brake Application on Take-Over Situations in Highly Automated Driving Scenarios , 2014 .

[20]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Highly automated driving with a decoupled steering wheel , 2014 .

[21]  Matthew S. Brown,et al.  Effects of Conversation on Situation Awareness and Working Memory in Simulated Driving , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Michela Terenzi,et al.  Using the Distribution of Eye Fixations to Assess Pilots' Mental Workload , 2006 .

[23]  Markus Maurer,et al.  Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung , 2012 .

[24]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.