mizuRoute version 1: a river network routing tool for a continental domain water resources applications

Abstract. This paper describes the first version of a stand-alone runoff routing tool, mizuRoute. The mizuRoute tool post-processes runoff outputs from any distributed hydrologic model or land surface model to produce spatially distributed streamflow at various spatial scales from headwater basins to continental-wide river systems. The tool can utilize both traditional grid-based river network and vector-based river network data. Both types of river network include river segment lines and the associated drainage basin polygons, but the vector-based river network can represent finer-scale river lines than the grid-based network. Streamflow estimates at any desired location in the river network can be easily extracted from the output of mizuRoute. The routing process is simulated as two separate steps. First, hillslope routing is performed with a gamma-distribution-based unit-hydrograph to transport runoff from a hillslope to a catchment outlet. The second step is river channel routing, which is performed with one of two routing scheme options: (1) a kinematic wave tracking (KWT) routing procedure; and (2) an impulse response function – unit-hydrograph (IRF-UH) routing procedure. The mizuRoute tool also includes scripts (python, NetCDF operators) to pre-process spatial river network data. This paper demonstrates mizuRoute's capabilities to produce spatially distributed streamflow simulations based on river networks from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Geospatial Fabric (GF) data set in which over 54 000 river segments and their contributing areas are mapped across the contiguous United States (CONUS). A brief analysis of model parameter sensitivity is also provided. The mizuRoute tool can assist model-based water resources assessments including studies of the impacts of climate change on streamflow.

[1]  I. Yucel,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of a flood forecasting system: Utility of numerical weather prediction model, data assimilation and satellite-based rainfall , 2015 .

[2]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Automated upscaling of river networks for macroscale hydrological modeling , 2008 .

[3]  D. J. Booker.  Predicting wetted width in any river at any discharge , 2010 .

[4]  S. Kanae,et al.  A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model , 2011 .

[5]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Streamflow simulation for continental‐scale river basins , 1997 .

[6]  Benjamin F. Zaitchik,et al.  Evaluation of the Global Land Data Assimilation System using global river discharge data and a source‐to‐sink routing scheme , 2010 .

[7]  S. Calmant,et al.  Large‐scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling of the Amazon River basin , 2013 .

[8]  Yinghai Ke,et al.  A Physically Based Runoff Routing Model for Land Surface and Earth System Models , 2013 .

[9]  A. K. Lohani,et al.  Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) models , 2007 .

[10]  Bernhard Lehner,et al.  Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems , 2013 .

[11]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Eegional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model , 1998 .

[12]  Victor Eijkhout,et al.  River Network Routing on the NHDPlus Dataset , 2011 .

[13]  P. K. Bhunya,et al.  Suitability of Gamma, Chi-square, Weibull, and Beta distributions as synthetic unit hydrographs , 2007 .

[14]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  A simple algorithm for generating streamflow networks for grid-based, macroscale hydrological models , 1999 .

[15]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[16]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  RivWidth: A Software Tool for the Calculation of River Widths From Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Deriving a global river network map and its sub-grid topographic characteristics from a fine-resolution flow direction map , 2009 .

[18]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph , 2014 .

[19]  M. Ek,et al.  Continental‐scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS‐2): 2. Validation of model‐simulated streamflow , 2012 .

[20]  T. Sturm,et al.  Open Channel Hydraulics , 2001 .

[21]  K. Mo,et al.  Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products , 2012 .

[22]  V. T. Chow.  Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[23]  G. Miguez-Macho,et al.  The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 1. Influence on seasonal streamflow, flooding and wetlands , 2012 .

[24]  G. Senay,et al.  Evaluation of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) Air Temperature Data Products , 2014 .

[25]  René Laprise,et al.  Implementation of a large‐scale variable velocity river flow routing algorithm in the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) , 2003 .

[26]  B. Bookhagen,et al.  Channel planform geometry and slopes from freely available high-spatial resolution imagery and DEM fusion: Implications for channel width scalings, erosion proxies, and fluvial signatures in tectonically active landscapes , 2013 .

[27]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States* , 2002 .

[28]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: Development, analysis, and control of error , 2001 .

[29]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Improving computational efficiency in global river models by implementing the local inertial flow equation and a vector‐based river network map , 2013 .

[30]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification , 1996 .

[31]  Dag Lohmann,et al.  A large‐scale horizontal routing model to be coupled to land surface parametrization schemes , 1996 .

[32]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System - PRMS. , 1995 .

[33]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  A variable velocity flow routing algorithm for GCMs , 1999 .

[34]  Francisco Olivera,et al.  Extracting low‐resolution river networks from high‐resolution digital elevation models , 2002 .

[35]  Upmanu Lall.  Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? One water. One world. Many climes. Many souls , 2014 .

[36]  Eric A. Rosenberg,et al.  A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States: Update and Extensions* , 2002 .

[37]  Michael Smith,et al.  Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service , 2004 .

[38]  R. Paiva,et al.  Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach , 2011 .

[39]  Tamlin M. Pavelsky,et al.  Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite‐derived North American River Width data set , 2015 .

[40]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  A Catchment‐Based Hydrologic and Routing Modeling System with explicit river channels , 2008 .

[41]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models , 2015 .

[42]  J. Kimball,et al.  A new global river network database for macroscale hydrologic modeling , 2012 .

[43]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Probability models for unit hydrograph derivation , 2007 .

[44]  V. Bell,et al.  Assessment of methods for extracting low-resolution river networks from high-resolution digital data , 2009 .

[45]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model , 2007 .

[46]  Seann Reed,et al.  Deriving flow directions for coarse‐resolution (1–4 km) gridded hydrologic modeling , 2003 .

[47]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .