Marr's Theory of the Neocortex as a Self-Organizing Neural Network

Marr's proposal for the functioning of the neocortex (Marr, 1970) is the least known of his various theories for specific neural circuitries. He suggested that the neocortex learns by self-organization to extract the structure from the patterns of activity incident upon it. He proposed a feedforward neural network in which the connections to the output cells (identified with the pyramidal cells of the neocortex) are modified by a mechanism of competitive learning. It was intended that each output cell comes to be selective for the input patterns from a different class and is able to respond to new patterns from the same class that have not been seen before. The learning rule that Marr proposed was underspecified, but a logical extension of the basic idea results in a synaptic learning rule in which the total amount of synaptic strength of the connections from each input (presynaptic) cell is kept at a constant level. In contrast, conventional competitive learning involves rules of the postsynaptic type. The network learns by exploiting the structure that Marr assumed to exist within the ensemble of input patterns. For this case, analysis is possible that extends that carried out by Marr, which was restricted to the binary classification task. This analysis is presented here, together with results from computer simulations of different types of competitive learning mechanisms. The presynaptic mechanism is best known in the computational neuroscience literature. In neural network applications, it may be a more suitable mechanism of competitive learning than those normally considered.

[1]  Harry G. Barrow,et al.  The Role of Weight Normalization in Competitive Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[2]  John Moody,et al.  Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units , 1989, Neural Computation.

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Theorems for the Asymptotic Analysis of Recursive Stochastic Algorithms , 1975 .

[4]  D. Willshaw The establishment and the subsequent elimination of polyneuronal innervation of developing muscle: theoretical considerations , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  Richard Durbin,et al.  An analogue approach to the travelling salesman problem using an elastic net method , 1987, Nature.

[6]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[8]  R. Sibson Information radius , 1969 .

[9]  D J Willshaw,et al.  An assessment of Marr's theory of the hippocampus as a temporary memory store. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  D J Willshaw,et al.  A marker induction mechanism for the establishment of ordered neural mappings: its application to the retinotectal problem. , 1979, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  D. Marr A theory for cerebral neocortex , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  D. Willshaw,et al.  On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  M. R. Bennett,et al.  Growth and elimination of nerve terminals at synaptic sites during polyneuronal innervation of muscle cells: a trophic hypothesis , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[15]  David Willshaw,et al.  Application of the elastic net algorithm to the formation of ocular dominance stripes , 1990 .

[16]  E. Bienenstock,et al.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[18]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive switching circuits , 1988 .

[19]  K. Miller,et al.  Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. , 1989, Science.

[20]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  N. Swindale A model for the formation of ocular dominance stripes , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Willshaw A simple network capable of inductive generalization , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  David Zipser,et al.  Feature Discovery by Competive Learning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  C. von der Malsburg Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. , 1973, Kybernetik.

[26]  R. A. Doney Introduction to Measure and Probability , 1967 .

[27]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[28]  C. Malsburg,et al.  How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.